SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
484 Tulvio, thanks for the considerate and in-depth response. Actually, I don'the dodger-3/2/1997
483 Bill -- Cardinal IS supporting x2... They've put out press releases that inCraig Anderson-3/1/1997
482 Steve-- From your post and the article I posted in #478 (Fortune re:"this Craig Anderson-3/1/1997
481 Steve, I am under the impression that Cardinal is supporting X2 since it is priBill Murphy-3/1/1997
480 Thanks for the reference, Craig. <i>And during Cascade's conference David Lawrence-3/1/1997
479 Steve: Your comments were very interesting -- I hadn't thought of what hapKatherine Hoff-3/1/1997
478 Anthony, Maybe someday we'll know the cause of the x2 delay, but I'm dDavid Lawrence-3/1/1997
477 Steve - I asked this question of Gary Greenfield on the other thread, and wouldCraig Anderson-3/1/1997
476 Hambrecht & Quist tied weakness in Ascend Communications (ASND) to investorAnthony-3/1/1997
475 In cast this wasn't posted here already: infoworld.comPaul Reuben-3/1/1997
474 At that moment, if you wanted to go long, and expected the merger to close at tDavid Lawrence-3/1/1997
473 Dodger, on the surface the analysis looks fine, and your prognosis may, hopefulTulvio Durand-3/1/1997
472 Steve, your post was the best I've read on USRX-related threads for weeks. Boon-3/1/1997
471 One question, COMS closed at $33.109 and USRX closed at $55.8125, why 1.75 * COBob bob-3/1/1997
470 Bob, That's the best thing to happen to RACE lately. Should get a nice popDavid Lawrence-3/1/1997
469 After reading this part of the USR-3COM agreement, I've no doubt that weBoon-3/1/1997
468 <i>>>Do you or anyone know why 3com went down so drastically a few David Lawrence-3/1/1997
467 Sal this may be another reason this marriage will look weaker!! Bob Metcalfe, Bob Biersack-3/1/1997
466 Excellent post, Steve: I brought up the point previously about pissed off analDavid Lawrence-3/1/1997
465 David: (I am a usrx holder) Do you or anyone know why 3com went down so drasticfreeus-3/1/1997
464 Steve: Excellent post... I have a few questions if you don't mind. <<bill c.-3/1/1997
463 Steve: >From an inside prospective, many market particpants *DO NOT WANT TOjim shiau-3/1/1997
462 Steve, You present a lot of intriguing angles on the COMS/USRX deal. Who is yoHassell Anderson-3/1/1997
461 Sal, In response to your statements that "even if every short on Wall StreDavid Pletcher-3/1/1997
460 The Doger: I agree with what the number you come out. I used to use the way yjim shiau-3/1/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News