SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
BAY Ntwks (under House)
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6980 8 0 BAY
Emcee:  Beachbumm Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4880 Dear BK - I think the last 2 weeks of March [next 2 weeks] will not be materialBosco-3/19/1998
4879 <<CF Boston & DLJ upgrades to buy. Estimate for Q3 now revised to $.B.K. Ohneis-3/19/1998
4878 Thread: Since right now it's been a big day and all is pretty quiet righKen Twining-3/19/1998
4877 Wiseowl: I am glad that you came thru on top. The move today was contrary to thDoug-3/18/1998
4876 RE - CBS article Richard Woo, networking analyst for Thomson Kernaghan & CRFF-3/18/1998
4875 Dear missing - since we know each other's view on BAY and CSCO, probably weBosco-3/18/1998
4874 Interesting article from CBS Bay wins battle but may lomissing-3/18/1998
4873 Mar 18, 1998 (6:17 PM ET) - The Motley Fool Evening News Networking products Mang Cheng-3/18/1998
4872 Paul That article implies decreased revenue growth for the networking companiemr. picker-3/18/1998
4871 Paul - This dog has more fleas then one can imagine. Time will prove this. TiJohnDoe-3/18/1998
4870 First call estimate is now 12c for 3rd quarter. Some analysts have faith in BaWiseGuy-3/18/1998
4869 All the top analysts expected a selloff today, I am sure they were surprised bybayhead-3/18/1998
4868 ok ... yesterday was a clear over-reaction. it closed at 26 11/16 and only in aVish Vishwanath-3/18/1998
4867 $26 1/2 not a bad rebound. Looks like the Street is going to base their valuatiRFF-3/18/1998
4866 eric, No problem. Yesterday was a long day for me too, in more ways than one. Lerxst-3/18/1998
4865 Dear Lerxst, eric podell-3/18/1998
4864 <<We could drift down to the $18 level till earnings are announced. >&Bald Eagle-3/18/1998
4863 Mang, Nice to see you back on the Bay thread. I think Victor was referring to Lerxst-3/18/1998
4862 <Despite all the claims and counter-claims, nobody had hard negative news duMang Cheng-3/18/1998
4861 Richard, That depends on if you believe BAY will accomplish what they have laiRFF-3/18/1998
4860 Ad in today's WSJ is taking CSCO head on. It compares Accelar 1200 to CiscoRFF-3/18/1998
4859 Victor, I'm need to the BAY thread, I would like some guidance on LEAPS foRichard Strutz-3/18/1998
4858 Bosco, you're right Cowen took BAY down from Strong Buy to Buy.WiseGuy-3/18/1998
4857 I just performed another fundamental analysis over at eduvest.com using First AWizard Wannabe-3/18/1998
4856 Vepoc: Right-On! Like I said yesterday after the earnings warning shortfallKen Twining-3/18/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):