Guess That Thread | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Guess That Thread

An SI Board Since August 2004

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
124	5	0

Emcee: Quahog	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
49	deleted.	The Philosopher	-	8/27/2004
48	The person who is banned nowhere on SI probably has no opinions worth mentioning	The Philosopher	-	8/27/2004
47	Class act. :)	Rambi	-	8/27/2004
46	42 (It didn't win on Quahog's number thread, maybe it will here)	Rambi	-	8/27/2004
45	Deleting was a good idea, though I didn't see your post. How would one have	E	-	8/27/2004
44	<b>25</b>	Quahog	-	8/27/2004
43	I noticed your presence there. It was a very nice list of names. I bet people ar	Rambi	-	8/27/2004
42	deleted	Poet	-	8/27/2004
41	<i> Ooooo, that's a goody.</i> Gee. I never realized that mult	The Philosopher	-	8/27/2004
40	Ooooo, that's a goody. I'm going to guess.........53 threads. Ansd I&#	Poet	-	8/27/2004
39	Who can come closest to guessing the number of threads the most-banned user has	SI Dave	-	8/27/2004
38	Please don't bring up food items. I'm very hungry today. <I>Doh	Poet	-	8/27/2004
37	<i>Wow! I am banned from somewhere and I never even KNEW it! That's ki	The Philosopher	-	8/27/2004
36	Not the name I was referring to, and not FTEL. Doh!!!	Quahog	-	8/27/2004
35	Ohhhh isn't that cute! Ban List for The Non-Political Joke Thread Poet	Poet	-	8/27/2004
34	for the damned i mean banned -gg	Poet	-	8/27/2004
33	I've combed through a number of times (pathetically) I think the name you m	Poet	-	8/27/2004
32	<i>I think it can be unintentionally humiliating.</i> For the banne	Glenn Petersen	-	8/27/2004
31	LOL!!!	Quahog	-	8/27/2004
30	Sorry, can't give you that hint...but I'll tell you this: I see one par	Quahog	-	8/27/2004
29	Ummmmm i was planning to win 3 or 4 times if you must know :-)	Poet	-	8/27/2004
28	C'mon, now. Let's be honest. Nobody needs to lose 3 pounds. If somebo	Quahog	-	8/27/2004
27	DRAT! I know it's a penny stock thread though, no?	Poet	-	8/27/2004
26	I think we should be given our choice of prizes, like curtains #1, 2 and 3. And	Poet	-	8/27/2004
25	<BUZZER> Sorry. Guess lightning doesn't strike twice!	Quahog	-	8/27/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):