SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5839 41 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Amboy Charlie Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4914I agree, but as the Mitsubishi case demonstrated, winning with a jury is not enoHal Campbell-2/7/2008
4913I think they would have had a very good shot at a trail with a jury,, they wouldDAMNEDIFYOUDO-2/7/2008
4912Why would someone be bidding for 6,000 at $1.84 now? Makes you wonder!justlooking1-2/7/2008
4911I'm very sorry folks, but this is not a surprise. The legislative and judHal Campbell-2/7/2008
4910Just what we didn't want to hear,,,now gonna be real tough to get the othersDAMNEDIFYOUDO-2/7/2008
4909Patent court affirms Kodak win over Ampex Thu Feb 7, 2008 11:37am EST Email | Pjustlooking1-2/7/2008
4908Looks like Kodak has stolen Ampex's patent and got away with it.mamenikr-2/7/2008
4907NEW BUSINESS SEGMENT FOR AMPEX : If the company wanted to truly market a succesvaluehunter-2/7/2008
4906<i>my ancient brain cells failed me</i> No Op. They didn't failHal Campbell-2/6/2008
4905I vaguely remember Mitsubishi, or have my ancient brain cells failed me.OPVet-2/6/2008
4904On what a appeal did they lose in the past. I don't recall.mamenikr-2/6/2008
4903Why should we have even a shred of optimism that Ampex can win a court case? TheOPVet-2/6/2008
4902Ampex's award comes up on sunday.It would appear to me to kill the possible mamenikr-2/6/2008
4901I hope you are correct, it's about time they won something or something wentchriscraft-2/6/2008
4900Thats the only thing I could reason, without new royalties, how can they kept goDAMNEDIFYOUDO-2/6/2008
4899Haven't heard from Karen yet.Kodak will pay this time if the appeal is grantmamenikr-2/6/2008
4898Could be, maybe you are on to something. So now everything could rest on this Kochriscraft-2/6/2008
4897I'm not, but if Kodak gets away with it, the others will, and probably have DAMNEDIFYOUDO-2/6/2008
4896I'm not, but like you have said they have had plenty of time to get going. chriscraft-2/6/2008
4895Don't count Commercial Strategy out yet.mamenikr-2/6/2008
4894Well maybe they feel thats their only shot at the other patents, have to beat KoDAMNEDIFYOUDO-2/6/2008
4893Anything goes, but that would be some hell of a way to make a decision. The waitchriscraft-2/6/2008
4892Something better be done, this crap cannot go on any longer. It's horse manuchriscraft-2/6/2008
4891Was just thinking maybe they have agreed to a stand still until the judges appeaDAMNEDIFYOUDO-2/6/2008
4890Have you heard from her yet? She usually gets back to you in a day or two if notchriscraft-2/6/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):