SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
DRKOOP.Com,Inc - (Nasdaq - KOOP)
An SI Board Since May 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
595 4 0 KOOP
Emcee:  Mohan Marette Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
495 eric, today looks like a bounce....which will probably fade... until KOOP canwlheatmoon-8/5/1999
494 as a small trading fund, we rely upon technical analysis primarily. today'hedge fund-8/5/1999
493 Dan - If I were you, I wouldn't give up on the Internet health-care businesEric Fader-8/4/1999
492 Eric, >>>I wouldn't for a moment consider buying Koop at these leDantex2-8/4/1999
491 Mike - Thanks for your input. While I agree with your views, generally, I woulEric Fader-8/4/1999
490 <<You know what KOOP sounds like don't you? >> boop dupe oop pwlheatmoon-8/4/1999
489 When a company runs up to $40 because it is spending millions of dollars on AOLRobert-8/4/1999
488 Eric, buy when there's blood in the streets,,,so far,,,just some oozing,,,wlheatmoon-8/4/1999
487 KOOP >> Very attractive buy at $15 3/4 Accumulating heavily. Have been WallStreetTips-8/4/1999
486 Westpacific - looks like KOOP is getting down toward what was your buy target. Eric Fader-8/4/1999
485 WestPacific--I just now noted your post. Having finished pitching a softball gPartyTime-7/30/1999
484 PT - my agenda is not to slam KOOP, it will survive and could become a take outwestpacific-7/29/1999
483 Apparently more than just your humble opinion... cgraham-7/29/1999
482 Very nicely put, Eric. My agenda, of course, is obvious: I've invested! PartyTime-7/29/1999
481 PT - If it sounded like I was saying that KOOP wasn't likely to be one of tEric Fader-7/29/1999
480 >>>Eric is correct. Too many competitors for too few revenue sources wPartyTime-7/28/1999
479 OFW--the following is actually a response to Eric. For some reason I can'tPartyTime-7/28/1999
478 One only has to look towards today's opening of Drugstore.com to see that tOFW-7/28/1999
477 PT - interesting statement about the research grants. I hadn't considered Eric Fader-7/28/1999
476 NOTE: This is the same response I gave you when you posted virtually identicalPartyTime-7/28/1999
475 Agree with Eric - generating revenue is key for success and they don't havewestpacific-7/28/1999
474 KOOP is retracing to high teens. JMHO. Addition to AOL was the <b>bigwlheatmoon-7/28/1999
473 There was a time (7/2/99)when KOOP made $23 we all were happy. I have to wonderJack Hartmann-7/28/1999
472 And here's what he'll be working on: post.messages.yahoo.com Also, coPartyTime-7/27/1999
471 drkoop.com Appoints Ian Bagnall to Chief Internet Strategist; Creator of Web Chas-7/26/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News