SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Nasdaq planning clampdown on Internet rumours
An SI Board Since September 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
250 6 0
Emcee:  Done, gone. Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
50 I hate interference in personal business as much as any human alive but I lost Oak Kanis-9/5/1997
49 Its my constitutional right nasdaq is in for a big fight. There acting like sheldon cohen-9/5/1997
48 No, it's not a prank: sra.com - JeffJeffrey S. Mitchell-9/5/1997
47 <i>intel is going bankrupt</i> Thank God its not usrx-coms. We havefreeus-9/5/1997
46 loved your post. Agree. Thats why my nomiker is Freeusfreeus-9/5/1997
45 re <i>intel INTC insider employee etc etc</i> GGGGGGGG Delightful Lfreeus-9/5/1997
44 > Impossible at any amount of money! You got a point, Trek. Can a dollar fIceberg-9/5/1997
43 Uh Paul, I would agree that this 'NazNet U2' device is a bit...uh...broBill Ulrich-9/5/1997
42 well if this is an effort to crack down on the 'pump and dump' schemes Paul A-9/5/1997
41 Ya right! Impossible at any amount of money!The Trek-9/5/1997
40 >I wouldn't be surprised if the whole idea is a prank. Jack, I woulIceberg-9/5/1997
39 Intel INTC insider employee buy sell news will come out tomorrow hugh droJack T. Pearson-9/5/1997
38 > It's time to declare war on tyranny! bob, Prior to a declaration Iceberg-9/5/1997
37 Sounded like NASDAQ made the investment. Someone told them it was a good idea (Jack T. Pearson-9/5/1997
36 This doesn't sound like America and the Bill of Rights anymore, something mbobby beara-9/5/1997
35 Jack, any idea whose $1-2M financed the operation? <eom> IceIceberg-9/5/1997
34 ....... AMD to purchase INTC ........ You heard it here firstDavid L. Wasylenko-9/5/1997
33 You have to admire the con man who got NASDAQ to put up $1M+ to search for &quoJack T. Pearson-9/5/1997
32 >I think that the press should call their bluff. jhild, It could very wIceberg-9/5/1997
31 I think that the press should call their bluff. I for one don't think they jhild-9/5/1997
30 IF YOU BUY ON A RUMOR AND LOSE...THAT's YOUR PROBLEM....DOESN't THE NASP.Prazeres-9/5/1997
29 Nasdaq spends time looking into the company's they list why dont they spendtrader-9/5/1997
28 I guess I need to move my holdings to the NYSE!ironROD-9/5/1997
27 I wonder if the NASD would consider Westergaards prediction of $2 a share in eaJEFF CHAPMAN-9/5/1997
26 >My big question is what do they plan to do to "clamp down" on rumIceberg-9/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):