SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Pangea Goldfields T.PGD
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1178 7 0 PGD
Emcee:  Larry Voyer Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
503 You're right - the poison pill in effect gives the company an extra 19 daysEnigma-11/17/1999
502 Robert, The poison pill only makes a buy out expensive IF it is UNFRIENDLY. TSyncrude-11/17/1999
501 "They have always had the goal of becoming a major gold company through exEnigma-11/17/1999
500 A junior that can raise $4M in cash in this market has to have a lot of potentiRobert-11/17/1999
499 Well, we'll see - the management is now in a position to build reserves - wEnigma-11/17/1999
498 DoubleD, No, the market was not anticipating the Barrick deal, I think it was Syncrude-11/17/1999
497 Yes I realsise that - but IMO the Barrick move was early - so thay can positionEnigma-11/17/1999
496 DoubleD, This is why I posted "potential". A takeover is by no meanSyncrude-11/17/1999
495 " indicates that any potential takeover will not happen before several monEnigma-11/17/1999
494 Terry, Just a guess on my part, but I think people were disappointed that PangSyncrude-11/17/1999
493 Any traders out there who have any idea why PGD gave all of yesterday's gaiTerry Swift-11/16/1999
492 The telling thing is that Barrick has secured the right to buy shares at a 50% Robert-11/15/1999
491 I agree, wholeheartedly. This is a very positive sign that Barrick knows there Terry Swift-11/15/1999
490 DD: Agree. We had an excellent close. It traded all the way up to C$4.30, downTerry Swift-11/15/1999
489 Hello Terry, Great news on pgd. The investment of Barrick shows one thing, thecharred-11/15/1999
488 That was a very good close today - not only do we have a change in the fundamenEnigma-11/15/1999
487 I don't know how much of a deterrent it will be, but Barrick has definitelTerry Swift-11/15/1999
486 Not at all. It doesn't preclude any offers from anyone; it just gives BarriTerry Swift-11/15/1999
485 What I didn't pick up from the PR at first is that the company is going to Enigma-11/15/1999
484 Tan Range Update: Tan Range and Barrick sign joint venture agreement on ItetemSyncrude-11/15/1999
483 Hi kidl You stated <<<Doesn't this part of the deal effectivFishfinder-11/15/1999
482 the party is starting? iagrree . the floor is established. 4.00 to 6.00 ijack BROSS-11/15/1999
481 It's a good deal: 1) It effectively seems to set a floor of $4.00 on the sEnigma-11/15/1999
480 Likely bad news for Pangea shareholders. Presumably this would deter other majPtaskmaster-11/15/1999
479 Doesn't this part of the deal effectively kill the chances of any third parkidl-11/15/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):