KLA-Tencor Corporation (KLAC) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
KLA-Tencor Corporation (KLAC)

An SI Board Since January 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1779	104	0	KLAC

Emcee: david jung	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
504	I could not agree more. It is great to see KLAC trading so high (54+), but I a	Brian Y.	-	7/6/1997
503	Cary,I am concerned about the valuations in this area on a short term basis.I h	16yearcycle	-	7/4/1997
502	KLA-Tencor fit together pretty well, from what I am told. The effectiveness of	ccryder	-	7/3/1997
501	ccryder: KLAC is really hard to predict now. First the sales of measurement equ	david	-	7/3/1997
500	David: Good thought. The IC market is so big and so dynamic that we won't s	John Wang	-	7/3/1997
499	Does anybody really believe the earnings predictions for KLAC? Using first call	ccryder	-	7/3/1997
498	John, One of my guiding principles during the last 6 years following the semieq	david	-	7/3/1997
497	Cary: Sounds that I am not the only one puzzled by LRCX strength! <<	John Wang	-	7/3/1997
496	John, RE: "I just cannot figure out why LRCX is moving with AMAT and KLAC	Cary Salsberg	-	7/2/1997
495	David: I will hold this stock. I just cannot figure out why LRCX is moving with	John Wang	-	7/2/1997
494	To ALL: One reason things are quiet is the recent merger. Earnings estimates w	david	-	7/2/1997
493	Brian: I still own about 900 shares (base price at $25 for majority). I asked m	John Wang	-	7/1/1997
492	Brian, Yep, should get this thread going. I'm in too, but sold some at 51	edwin mok	-	7/1/1997
491	Can't get any news on KLAC, but this is the typical pattern of KLAC, it ten	edwin mok	-	7/1/1997
490	What was "Wrong" with KLAC and AMAT today, the only stocks with some	ccryder	-	7/1/1997
489	Am I the only person out here who still trades this stock? This thread is dead	Brian Y.	-	7/1/1997
488	ccryder: Thanks. It is OK. How about SMIT's product? People said it is real	John Wang	-	5/28/1997
487	I found the post regarding Orbot. Competition could be "formidable"	ccryder	-	5/27/1997
486	ccryder: Thanks. John	John Wang	-	5/26/1997
485	There were some comments regarding Orbot/AMAT some time back. I will see if I	ccryder	-	5/26/1997
484	ccryder: Thanks. Could you continue to post on any new stuff from this guy? Wha	John Wang	-	5/25/1997
483	Cary....some more recent numbers on KLAC..... Zacks Company Report: KLAC Zack	Teri Skogerboe	-	5/25/1997
482	Posts are encouraging but devoid of numbers. (He is an insider, afterall.) Sal	ccryder	-	5/25/1997
481	Cary: Thanks for reply. I don't have other estimate to back me up. However,	John Wang	-	5/25/1997
480	John, RE: "Isn't it not too far off considering the EPS comparison be	Cary Salsberg	-	5/24/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):