SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5040Well, of course he doesn't know that. It's one of those plots by the liThe Philosopher-2/28/2003
5039<i>public <b>and nonpublic</b> school students </i> ThaLane3-2/28/2003
5038<i> Thus, it makes sense that we are especially attentive to his concerns Lane3-2/28/2003
5037I'd rather go to the library than your stoggie old pub anyway.one_less-2/28/2003
5036I didn't need my shovel. The snow was soft and I was able to just plow my cLane3-2/28/2003
5035Bill would mandate recitation of Pledge By Jessica Carlson Daily Correspondent TimF-2/28/2003
5034I remember something like this from a twilight zone episode but I don't remeDMaA-2/28/2003
5033LOLOLOL! Sorry, I meant "does not revolve"......Neocon-2/28/2003
5032He should read Ptolemy. Then he would know something as basic as that.The Philosopher-2/28/2003
5031Huh? Since when did you get this illusion that you were married?The Philosopher-2/28/2003
5030He does not know that the sun revolves around the earth.Neocon-2/28/2003
5029Ok. DAMN! When's my wife's birthday?!?!?!DMaA-2/28/2003
5028555-6842 Now write it down and don't forget it again.The Philosopher-2/28/2003
5027You and Sherlock Holmes. If you read him, you probably remember the passage, whThe Philosopher-2/28/2003
5026I get the distinction. <!>The Philosopher-2/28/2003
5025I was selling clothes back then and I noticed it was the same words over and oveIsh-2/28/2003
5024Yep, just being me<g>. Glad to know we are on the same page on the substanNeocon-2/28/2003
5023Sorry? For what? You were just being you. I'm the dense one. To answer your Tom Clarke-2/28/2003
5022I get it. Sorry.....Neocon-2/28/2003
5021You must have just learned something really cool....Tom Clarke-2/28/2003
5020You asked me if it was "inherently unlikely", then proceeded to say yoTom Clarke-2/28/2003
5019I didn't know that before. Hey, what the hell's my telephone number?DMaA-2/28/2003
5018They say we reach our athletic peak at 27. Maybe the brain is tied in with that.Tom Clarke-2/28/2003
5017Why would you want to grab a shovel when you could be looking up at the snow falTom Clarke-2/28/2003
5016I don't think so. I asked if you thought it inherently plausible that there Neocon-2/28/2003
5015<<I think losing words has more to do with who you're hanging with, thIsh-2/28/2003
5014<i>'Extract' sounds like serious business.</i> It IS seriouLane3-2/28/2003
5013'Extract' sounds like serious business. 'Retrieve' connotes a moTom Clarke-2/28/2003
5012"Retrieve" is good, too, although not quite the meaning I was looking Lane3-2/28/2003
5011Extract. That's the word I wanted. I don't know whether to give your lLane3-2/28/2003
5010ummm....retrieve...?Tom Clarke-2/28/2003
5009This may help- dictionary.reference.comIsh-2/28/2003
5008<i>Maybe Homer Simpson was right.</i> LOL. I remember back in collLane3-2/28/2003
5007<i>So we're not imposing the solution, we're just the instrument bLane3-2/28/2003
5006<i>Well, I think that's what his intention was. So we can agree that hLane3-2/28/2003
5005Maybe Homer Simpson was right. When you learn new things, you forget stuff you uTom Clarke-2/28/2003
5004<i>Maybe it's just midlife ADD.... </i> It's sure somethingLane3-2/28/2003
5003But isn't the solution really being imposed by the UN? After all, the UN haThe Philosopher-2/27/2003
5002Well, I think that's what his intention was. So we can agree that his intenThe Philosopher-2/27/2003
5001Perhaps vulgarians are editing the Oxford these days....Tom Clarke-2/27/2003
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News