SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis
An SI Board Since February 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
52237 561 0
Emcee:  Paul Shread Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
50562I probably dont understand the adjustment on MP using sma's. have to re-reaNancy-8/2/2004
50561Here is a flaw on your assumption. Remember that chart I posted for the adjustmeCompadre-8/2/2004
50560<<You were right about SMH being out of whack. There was an error in the cNancy-8/1/2004
50559This is an example of using SMA to adjust MP to compensate for a trending marketCompadre-7/30/2004
50558You were right about SMH being out of whack. There was an error in the calculatiCompadre-7/29/2004
50557yea, intc is like that also.Compadre-7/29/2004
50556tkx. SMH looks like last month, way out of whack.Nancy-7/29/2004
50555Here are the pics. And by the way, the OI has not changed much since last week. Compadre-7/28/2004
50554Aug MP has not moved from 2 days ago. Still slightly above 35. However Oct MP caCompadre-7/28/2004
50553Jaime, look at the calls piling up on QQQ 35 & up, though there are lots ofNancy-7/28/2004
50552BTW, when I said Monday, I meant Monday of last week. But this could be it but sCompadre-7/28/2004
50551Today marking bottom? That pump smelling too fishy...Softechie-7/28/2004
50550I have been expecting a bottom since monday, but it never came.Compadre-7/28/2004
50549I expect NAZ to 1800 and then bounce...do you see the same?Softechie-7/28/2004
50548The hourly charts are working a down channel. It will be tough to break the uppeCompadre-7/27/2004
50547If the NDX closes above the 5 sma (1385) this will be the 3rd time it will do soCompadre-7/27/2004
50546Yes they did, but that matter was settled already. I don't know the details Compadre-7/26/2004
50545didn't CSCO sue Huwei last year on patent infringement ?Nancy-7/26/2004
50544yeah, the news was out over the weekend. Note : there is NO plan but Brynt saidNancy-7/26/2004
50543biz.yahoo.comCompadre-7/26/2004
50542CSCO's problem is Huwei, it is cutting csco on the low end. JNPR is at the hCompadre-7/26/2004
50541That too. 100% agree. not only about growth, but also about a lot harder to pNancy-7/26/2004
50540JNPR has 441M float CSCO 6.7B, there is no way that CSCO can be a growth Co withJack of All Trades-7/26/2004
50539About MSFT is a growth company, contrary to others view. I know JNPR is eating Nancy-7/26/2004
50538Do you know what barrons said about msft? As far as CSCO is concern, JNPR has bCompadre-7/26/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):