IGTG - Ingen Technologies, Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
IGTG - Ingen Technologies, Inc.

An SI Board Since April 2005

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
581	19	0	IGTG

Emcee: rrufff	Type: Moderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
506	reverse splits are never good, and never do what the CEOs expect them to do: ma	grizzy	-	10/6/2005
505	No unfortunately, a reverse split only affects the current outstanding balance.	rrufff	-	10/6/2005
504	A/S should be 12.5M not 100M, on a 40 for 1 reversal.	whenitgoesup	-	10/6/2005
503	great....<sarcasm>this should send the stock soaring</sarcasm>	grizzy	-	10/6/2005
502	Ingen Technologies, Inc. Announces Its Board Has Approved a 40-1 Reverse Stock S	rrm_bcnu	-	10/6/2005
501	Lawyers, glad I don't any...j.k. one of my best friends is a lawyer in Nashv	creede	-	10/3/2005
500	Pink sheet CEO's have to learn not to give themselves artificial deadlines t	rrufff	-	10/3/2005
499	New to this board: What happened to the filing yesterday? The RB board is gettin	sandsoftime	-	10/1/2005
498	all eyes (ears) on tomorrow....the SEC filing is supposed to be made by the end	grizzy	-	9/29/2005
497	Thanks rruff, that helps a lot!	seapick	-	9/29/2005
496	Splits are like what happens when you slice a pie. You can cut it into 4 pieces	rrufff	-	9/28/2005
495	rruff, all's quiet in here this A.M. so I'll ask a general question (not	seapick	-	9/28/2005
494	well, with respect to IGTN, I suspect that the MMs are waiting for the financial	grizzy	-	9/28/2005
493	There is a lot of confusion and dispute with respect to the Reg Sho list. There	rrufff	-	9/28/2005
492	IGTN (along with a ton of others) made the Regulatory SHO security list nasdaqt	grizzy	-	9/26/2005
491	I received a separate email to a separate question, but the nuts and bolts were	guilium1	-	9/23/2005
490	right with ya, taxgun...as I said a while back on one of these boards, stocks do	grizzy	-	9/23/2005
489	This is from IHUB. I can not verify its veracity. If correct, it would bode we	rrufff	-	9/23/2005
488	Looks like bashers are in full tilt boogie on this one. IMO, Sands opened himse	rrufff	-	9/23/2005
487	Not quite everyone.	taxgun	-	9/23/2005
486	looks like everyone is leaving this bad boy, ouch ...	blind-geezer	-	9/23/2005
485	to me this is a complete wonder....the price seems to have settled in the high t	grizzy	-	9/22/2005
484	Please don't misunderstand what I wrote on Ihub. To clarify: Someone asked	march22	-	9/21/2005
483	Frim Ihub, [althogh I read the intial posting on RB as well] The rumor of a rev	guilium1	-	9/21/2005
482	Who's word?	Penny Hard A Way	-	9/21/2005

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):