AremisSoft Corporation (AREM) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
AremisSoft Corporation (AREM)

An SI Board Since April 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
683	15	0	AREM

Emcee: DD™	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
508	Well, no, actually, only the first ten pages of that chapter talk about recapita	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	7/3/2001
507	There is a whole chapter in the book "You Can Be a Stock Market Genius"	benchpress550	-	7/3/2001
506	I must confess I have no idea what connection you imagine exists between FMC'	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	7/3/2001
505	<I>Even if what AREM wants to accomplish with this recapitalization is bot	benchpress550	-	7/3/2001
504	Tell you what, I'm going to express it as simply as I can, in about thirty w	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	7/2/2001
503	Perhaps it might be better if you present the underlying thesis to a wider audie	MSB	-	7/2/2001
502	<I>I guess my tofu-brain does not understand why you say that the company	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	7/2/2001
501	<<My understanding of arem is that they have subscription based accounting	Bob Rudd	-	7/2/2001
500	My mistake - please disregard. Thanks. (eom)	Dale Baker	-	7/2/2001
499	<<Except that it's the contention of the longs here that "scrutin	Bob Rudd	-	7/2/2001
498	Please list the securities laws violations you are accusing AREM of. I am sure	Ben Wa	-	7/2/2001
497	If you thought I was intending that last comment to refer to AREM, you thought w	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	7/2/2001
496	<I>The SEC is not the FDA who have the ability to rule something you inges	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	7/2/2001
495	<i>At any rate, never underestimate the chutzpah of a company committing f	Dale Baker	-	7/2/2001
494	You are quite good at twisting words. If, for example, every time an investor bo	Ben Wa	-	7/2/2001
493	<I>Another reason companies with more fraudulent aspects might not engage	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	7/2/2001
492	a little more reasoning - just as it makes sense to get into a stock that you th	Ben Wa	-	7/2/2001
491	subscription based accounting has helped slash the eps of firms like acxm when t	Ben Wa	-	7/2/2001
490	I disagree with your conclusion. that's about it - ps - stay away from the	Ben Wa	-	7/2/2001
489	Ben Wa: Another reason companies with more fraudulent aspects might not engage i	Bob Rudd	-	7/2/2001
488	My point is that, by my figuring, this precedent this would set would make it ex	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	7/2/2001
487	Yes, I get it. Finally. Merci beaucoup.	Seeker of Truth	-	7/2/2001
486	I think you are misinterpreting the ramifications of the AREM move. First, I am	Ben Wa	-	7/2/2001
485	I think that if arem were really having problems then this recapitalization woul	Gordon Foster	-	7/1/2001
484	<I>maybe AREM is the first to think of it.</I> Well then maybe we o	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	7/1/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):