SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only!
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6843 13 0 AMD
Emcee:  Robert Walter Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5118 James thank you for the news. It seems recently intel made a lot of noise abouAK2004-3/20/1998
5117 Albert, Here is a news about AMD-3D Technology. Metrowerks to Provide SoftwJames Yu-3/20/1998
5116 Maxwell, Re: "Do you know what is the die size for the PII on 0.25um? Is Yousef-3/20/1998
5115 Dr. Engel: Thanks for the yield information on 0.25um PII. "North of 140Maxwell-3/20/1998
5114 Doug - Re: "what is the current yield percentage(roughly), " 70% isPaul Engel-3/20/1998
5113 Joseph - Re: "AMD actually BEAT Intel to market with a better laptoPaul Engel-3/20/1998
5112 Kennee - Re: "it got caught selling slower CPU as faster one in the past.Paul Engel-3/20/1998
5111 Kenith, Re:" Why not sell them as 333?" What do you think Intel is sTiley-3/19/1998
5110 Manish, The question I asked is directed to Mr. Know-it-all. It is not directeKenith Lee-3/19/1998
5109 Anand on K6-3D at CeBit anandtech.com 4Kevin K. Spurway-3/19/1998
5108 Paul, I'd like to know what is the maximum die per wafer that Intel can yiDoug M.-3/19/1998
5107 Kenith, You continue to ask the same questions again and again. The 233/266/300Tiley-3/19/1998
5106 Paul re:<i>So go and buy the darn thing!</i> you sound a bit upsetAK2004-3/19/1998
5105 Again I say let the sales figures speak for themselves for the compaq 1621 k6 2Joseph Stumpf-3/19/1998
5104 Kenny, Re -- I am too slow to pick it up You sure are. Are you small too? mayStockMan-3/19/1998
5103 Ali, Paul made a typo and said I am too slow to pick it up. Beside that typo, Kenith Lee-3/19/1998
5102 Paul, <I said HAVE - what don't you..> So, in addition to retardatioAli Chen-3/19/1998
5101 Kenith that could be. I recall their old road-map that went from k6 to k6-3d tAK2004-3/19/1998
5100 <i>About 95% are faster than 350 MHz. That will improve shortly.</i>Kenith Lee-3/19/1998
5099 Kenny, Re -- K6 or having it as the low end since it is a bit smaller than theStockMan-3/19/1998
5098 Albert, I have referenced somewhere regarding to another version after 3D+ butKenith Lee-3/19/1998
5097 Stocky re: </i>you are babbling. he-he-he-he</i> I do indeed :-))AK2004-3/19/1998
5096 Barbies, Re -- DO YOU SUPPOSE THEY ARE MAKING SOME 0.25 FEATURE SIZE PARTS IN QStockMan-3/19/1998
5095 Re: "real products already in mass production" I know, Paul. I'mKevin K. Spurway-3/19/1998
5094 DRBES you'll get Stocky and Paul upset by this "wild" speculationAK2004-3/19/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News