SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ViaSat
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1112 33 0 VSAT
Emcee:  Christopher Gates Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
512 Valueman, raping not done. They still have over 200K over allotment option. Ramsey Su-4/19/2000
511 This is ridiculous. Merrill bombs the secondary and comes out with a lowball prValueman-4/19/2000
510 So VSAT got a whopping $25 a share from their secondary? Zakrosian-4/19/2000
509 Merrill has positive report out this a.m. In part it reads: ViaSat Inc (VSAT; Braam-4/19/2000
508 Absolutely Sickening. I had trusted management to do the right thing. I assumEd Mayer-4/18/2000
507 I wonder how many shareholders sold at 30 today, with ML sitting on the bid. Ramsey Su-4/18/2000
506 Amen Bernard. That is the worst example of a secondary I have ever seen, and MValueman-4/18/2000
505 Too bad brokerage firms can't be sued for malpractice. Merrill represents aBernard Levy-4/18/2000
504 Keep dreaming.dwight martin-4/18/2000
503 A post to all. Anyone interesting in seeking legal remedies to recent fiasco? Ramsey Su-4/18/2000
502 Yes; I don't follow the logic of having proceeded with the stock down more Sawtooth-4/18/2000
501 Yes, it did. Thank you Merrill for getting us 30 f$%#@ing bucks. Hell--why not Valueman-4/18/2000
500 No it didn't. Probably tomorrow. Agree the $33 looks like attractive priceBraam-4/17/2000
499 Did the offering take place? Anyone here buying at $33? Looks like a great buSawtooth-4/17/2000
498 Paul, I don't "automatically assume" anything. I've read thebryston-4/17/2000
497 Although I agree that ViaSat is a really-solid company with plenty of potentialPaul Hackett-4/16/2000
496 Yes, the secondary is to price Monday. I believe the current pricing of this sbryston-4/14/2000
495 Valueman, Bryston, et al : According to Merrill (one of the lead underwriters)Braam-4/14/2000
494 We shouldn't get into an ICO discussion on the VSAT thread, but it certainlbryston-4/12/2000
493 Actually the ICO model seems logical to me, e.g. providing telephone service anUUplink-4/12/2000
492 I have some doubts about the need for these LEO BB systems. I acknowledge the bryston-4/12/2000
491usatoday.com Something to keep an eye onValueman-4/12/2000
490 <i>ASTROLINK and ViaSat intend to continue discussions relating to a poteValueman-4/4/2000
489 Valueman & Bryston -- what's your evaluation of the importance of VSAT&Braam-4/4/2000
488 For those who are unaware, Astrolink is the global BB initiative of Lockheed Mabryston-4/3/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News