SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
PETD Petroleum Developmant-- Oil / Natural gas
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
688 14 0 PETD
Emcee:  Feraldo Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
513 Now if we can get a rise in oil prices perhaps we will go up . I think we are goilstks-5/14/1998
512 Lost 1/8 on a 15% reduction of EPS. Not bad! I knew PETD was going to take caBruce A. Thompson-5/14/1998
511 I think it will be weak short due to current weakness in oil prices . But longeoilstks-5/13/1998
510 It will be interesting to see how PETD does the next few days.They're stillsheetmillgalvanize-5/13/1998
509 I can not give you any good reason for this . I would guess that since its a smoilstks-5/13/1998
508 Why this company's price is so lower, compared with the same sort ones? Thxiao-Dong Fan-5/13/1998
507 Petroleum Development Reports Record First Quarter Revenue and Earnings BRIDGEoilstks-5/13/1998
506 You mention that PETD might buy Columbia soon.Columbia who and when was this mesheetmillgalvanize-5/11/1998
505 I am wondering if this might have something to do with the one mil shares the cDeeDee M-5/11/1998
504 Joseph, I too read that earnings have been lowered But I also can't find aBruce A. Thompson-5/8/1998
503 I read where PETD earnings were lowered but haven't read it with my own eyesheetmillgalvanize-5/8/1998
502 Looks like we will never get above 6.25. How discouraging. Andy Andrew Wallace-5/8/1998
501 Ask & You Shall Recieve. Moving on volume this afternoon. Up 5/16 on a 70Bruce A. Thompson-4/21/1998
500 Hi, I don't spend much time in chat these days, but have followed your thDeeDee M-4/17/1998
499 Gary, I don't think $.40 is unrealistic. Even with the increase in outstaBruce A. Thompson-4/15/1998
498 $.21 would be good. $.40 is unrealistic PETD has 15 million shares outstandinGary C. Kennedy-4/14/1998
497 Someone predicted that eps for the Q would be $.21. That's going to be wayBruce A. Thompson-4/14/1998
496 Joe, Since there wasn't any follow through today and the volume was off iMike Medford-4/13/1998
495 Mike,There was an argument on another BB(so many I forget) about the trade and sheetmillgalvanize-4/13/1998
494 Good question. I don't have live feed data to look at to tell, maybe someoMike Medford-4/13/1998
493 Was it at the bid or the ask?Robert T. Quasius-4/12/1998
492 Does anyone know the basis of the large volume spike Thursday? It came in duriMike Medford-4/12/1998
491 There are so many bargains in this sector, especially with microcaps, that it iRobert T. Quasius-4/8/1998
490 Robert, As long as it stays under $6 I'm buying. I've tripled my posiBruce A. Thompson-4/8/1998
489 Here's some other news that would appear to be good for natural gas plays lRobert T. Quasius-4/8/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):