SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
QQQ - Nasdaq 100 Trust
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
840 98 0 QQQ
Emcee:  M CAHILL Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
515No I did not sell them, I even bought more at 60. I really do not think we will robert duke-4/4/2001
514Hi S, Thanks, that was just what the Dr. ordered. Best regards, TomOldAIMGuy-4/4/2001
513Reviewed quarterly. They give themselves some wiggle room for moving in and out Savant-4/4/2001
512Hi S, How often does the NDX change its make-up assuming some of these stocks arOldAIMGuy-4/4/2001
511Added a further packet at 34...Casting a glance at my chart that seems to indicaSavant-4/4/2001
510I think being maxed out in a position and buying more would put a person at greaanon-4/4/2001
509What inconsistency? He said he didn't buy a lot, i.e., not a large quantity.Math Junkie-4/4/2001
508P.S. Robert Duke, i'm not picking on you. I follow this thread and I just anon-4/4/2001
507Robert Duke, did you get stopped out of your buys from 78-83? I dont believe yoanon-4/3/2001
506I never thought it would go this low without a correction back to 3000. It just robert duke-4/3/2001
505looks like its right in the middle of your target range.amadeus-4/3/2001
504Hi Rap, Last time I looked there were only about two or three of the 100 stocks OldAIMGuy-4/3/2001
503Hi Tom: Thanks for the link, interesting! I have been watching the Q's sinRaptech-4/3/2001
502Hi I, Here's an interesting site for looking inside the Nasdaq 100 Index preOldAIMGuy-4/3/2001
501I think the smartest thing here....is to change the name.10K a day-3/11/2001
500I would tend to agree. I bought some at 78 and then some at 60 a share. I would robert duke-3/11/2001
499R.D : 70 is way too high. Max 30% from current 45. Unfortunately I do not haveDoug-3/10/2001
498I still think we will get a rally which will pull the qqq up to about 70 before robert duke-3/10/2001
497Novellus Systems, Inc. to Join the Nasdaq-100 Index BSavant-3/10/2001
496R.D: My guess is 1800. Good luck.Doug-3/9/2001
495Picked up a touch at 45 and change. More if it hits 1800/1900 on Naz. FWIW Best,Savant-3/9/2001
494What would your guess be as to the bottom range. I have to tell you that if the robert duke-3/9/2001
493R.D: I would be watching the earnings. If the earnings forecast continues to be Doug-3/7/2001
492So if the market moves higher and then comes back down for a final bottom what krobert duke-3/7/2001
491this is an interesting point, thanks for posting it Bobbob wallace-3/6/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):