SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
James Cramer
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
766 33 0
Emcee:  cicak Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
516 Jordan, Elway, Rubin; now Cramer ? take the cash & bow out at the top ? ..SliderOnTheBlack-5/12/1999
515 add to that list 5 more ipo's since 5/6... ROIA, PRSF, DEST, LATD and MAKR.mr.mark-5/12/1999
514 i bet you that isn't the case. i bet more ipo's either a) close thmr.mark-5/12/1999
513 Yes, that's what I meant. BarbMama Bear-5/12/1999
512 barb, so by "par for the ipo course", you're saying that most ofmr.mark-5/12/1999
511 Yes mr. mark, today's loss was par for the IPO course. It wouldn't surpMama Bear-5/12/1999
510 i take it from your response that many of them trade this way. mr.mark-5/12/1999
509 mr. mark, I'll have to guess you haven't watched many IPO's tradinMama Bear-5/12/1999
508 down 6 today. not a good day for the second day of trading for an ipo, don'mr.mark-5/12/1999
507 Where do you think this stock will be in one year? Will Cramer still be on CNBDemetre Deliyanakis-5/11/1999
506 Agreed - congratulations to James Cramer on a very successful IPO !! I also jucicak-5/11/1999
505 Congratulations Cramer Cramer's share is worth about $250 million based upAdam Weiner-5/11/1999
504 <i> seems as though no one is fooled by the increased subscription numberStocker-5/11/1999
503 seems as though no one is fooled by the increased subscription numbers. but i mr.mark-5/11/1999
502 TheStreet.com prices at top of range By Bloomberg News Special to CNEStocker-5/10/1999
501 Interesting that there's been no mention here (at least not that I've sStocker-5/10/1999
500 here's an excerpt: <i>" But with Wall Street buzzing about the mr.mark-5/10/1999
499 Thestreet.com is the subject of today's WSJ Heard on The Street column. I wAdam Weiner-5/10/1999
498 >This forum is supposed to be about James Cramer. It is, as were my postsDavid Harker-5/10/1999
497 Well said Deliveryman. Time to move on. Just heard the IPO was bumped up to $Shafik Habal-5/10/1999
496 Actually, the return of an individual is not really comparable to the return ofMama Bear-5/10/1999
495 I am finding your postings to be quite silly. This forum is supposed to be aboDeliveryman-5/10/1999
494 >>Why listen to someone who can only make 2% in an entire year?! >>David Harker-5/10/1999
493 >Why listen to someone who can only make 2% in an entire year?! >I donRainMan29-5/9/1999
492 NN, thanks for the excellent synopsis. Good luck. Regards, SH Shafik Habal-5/7/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):