SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5839 41 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Amboy Charlie Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5164It's all rigged together, that is what I have been saying all along. This tchriscraft-3/12/2008
5163Mr. Douglas McClure is only director up for re-election in 2008 and with one offfuntimes_52-3/12/2008
5162They are due for earnings in March unless they push them for some reason. So yeschriscraft-3/12/2008
5161Are they, (ampx), required to report 4th quarter and year end results before thDAMNEDIFYOUDO-3/12/2008
5160Anything is possible and I'm sure the other Funds are just as fed up like alchriscraft-3/12/2008
5159Can V.V. go one further and have a vote to put themselves in charge like BramsonDAMNEDIFYOUDO-3/12/2008
5158PS. Banks do not just walk in the door without reason.Especially with the price mamenikr-3/11/2008
5157Good point and I really hope what you say is true. Hoping for the best for us achriscraft-3/11/2008
5156Wether they do or they don't the pressure is being put on them to produce mamenikr-3/11/2008
5155Sure does look better if V.V. gets a member on the board..If ampx balks, theyDAMNEDIFYOUDO-3/11/2008
5154Form 8-K for AMPEX CORP /DE/ -------------------------------------------------wvbuild 06-3/11/2008
5153Yes Paul just read that myself this is a more detailed version of it si.advfn.cchriscraft-3/11/2008
5152Sure, the patents IF they came through could be worth hundreds of millions..but DAMNEDIFYOUDO-3/11/2008
5151Value Vest writes again in a new filing Item 4 is amended by inserting the follPaul Lee-3/11/2008
5150I would think the Patents "IF" monetized are worth much much more thanchriscraft-3/11/2008
5149BAC buying 102k shares is a mystery if nothing is resolved,,though they do seem DAMNEDIFYOUDO-3/11/2008
5148James in your last sentence I noticed you use the word WE instead of I ??? You aduke of axc-3/11/2008
5147<i>The theory that Ampex may have pulled the plug on Dutton reports may hafuddled-3/11/2008
5146Let's hope Dutton's track record with Ampex's upgrades and downgradechriscraft-3/11/2008
5145Why would Bank America, UBS and Bear Sterns be involved in this company at all? chriscraft-3/11/2008
5144So if Hillside gains nothing in a BK, what the frick is this all about, for bothDAMNEDIFYOUDO-3/10/2008
5143The short answer is unchanged from where we were weeks before Dutton's latesJames Feldman-3/10/2008
5142So who will end up with the patents and ADS IF this is the end??...Hillside or tDAMNEDIFYOUDO-3/10/2008
5141Gosh Hal, it's been a while since I posted. But, I have my own theory as to Alan Cassaro-3/10/2008
5140I wonder if the are gonna hire Spitzer since he will need a job if he doesn'chriscraft-3/10/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News