SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
BAY Ntwks (under House)
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6980 8 0 BAY
Emcee:  Beachbumm Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5180 Re: Earnings report-- I have confirmed with Bay IR that earnings will be reporPaul Fine-4/8/1998
5179 Dear Walter: Sure, if it makes you feel better. House owes us AT LEAST that tJDN-4/8/1998
5178 Can I interpret this fiasco as House (inadvertently?) kicking Chambers in the bw2j2-4/8/1998
5177 all - well, not sure how to make of it. The ultimate victim probably is Messr JBosco-4/8/1998
5176 Hi Adam, I was eagerly awaiting your inevitable post of teens and single digitLerxst-4/8/1998
5175 <<adam hefian - I got a good laugh out of your last post. That was prettyjkb-4/8/1998
5174 Dear RFF: OH MAN, somebody was shitten and gitten when that press release cameJDN-4/8/1998
5173 RFF, thanks for solving the mystery. It does suggest that Cisco was involved iWiseGuy-4/8/1998
5172 Sorry to interrupt the doom and gloom. But I just got a major buy signal on BaAndon-4/8/1998
5171 This is from an INS Qtrly report under risk section. I think this solves the myRFF-4/8/1998
5170 I also think CSCO has something to do with INSS, If they pulled out of the agrePierre Aydin-4/8/1998
5169 CSCO does have a relationship with INS: <b>SUNNYVALE, Calif., Jan. 27 /PRFF-4/8/1998
5168 Adam, Just a little dramatic wouldn't you say. Do you think my homeowners James Petersen-4/8/1998
5167 adam hefian - I got a good laugh out of your last post. That was pretty doomsdaRFF-4/8/1998
5166 I agree with you that BAY will soon become a savvy buy, but, probably not untilTHOMAS GOODRICH-4/8/1998
5165 We are down again today which has been the norm for the past 3 years for BAY.Aladam hefian-4/8/1998
5164 It probably is prudent to wait, but figure at most there is 2-3 more points of RFF-4/8/1998
5163 [offtopic] Dear RFF - still kicking myself for selling ASND, but it does have sBosco-4/8/1998
5162 I'm holding my position but personally I wouldn't add more until after Daveyk-4/8/1998
5161 ...and look at ASND, up 1+ and breaking $40/sh. I guess I've got a lot to lRFF-4/8/1998
5160 Couln't resist anymore and added some more to my position. The PR issue is RFF-4/8/1998
5159 Dear Gary: The press release contains a DIRECT QUOTE from an OFFICER of INS. JDN-4/8/1998
5158 Dear Gary - I think we are beating the dead horse here. As I pointed out in theBosco-4/8/1998
5157 Well JDN (and Bosco), it was not my intent to get you to "switch horses&quThe Phoenix-4/8/1998
5156 Dear Gary: No one will EVER make me believe that BAY KNOWINGLY misrepresented JDN-4/8/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News