SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Texas Instruments - Good buy now or should we wait?
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6180 200 0 TXN
Emcee:  JP Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5180I'd be a buyer of Texas Instruments. It's cheap!!! Look at all those stoMephisto-8/14/2000
5179Is semiconductor decline overdone? By Roy Blumberg, CBS MarkJack Hartmann-8/11/2000
5178NEW YORK, Aug 7,Chase H&Q analyst Lucas Ward on Monday ``aggressively'&#Mephisto-8/9/2000
5177"Executives from Texas Instruments also recently reiterated their forecastsMephisto-8/9/2000
5176<i>"DSP is becoming the most important semiconductor technology of thMephisto-8/8/2000
5175A pretty good article detailing TI's attempt to dominate the DSP market (alaslacker711-8/8/2000
5174The cyclical nature of the semiconductor market has been the subject of much disMephisto-8/4/2000
5173I would add that, in addition to the license from Qualcomm, TI may need a licensJGoren-7/31/2000
5172Here's a scenario that includes all that I understand about this situation. rgammon-7/31/2000
5171J-- I appreciate your clarification of an issue that I wondered about. Of courFred Levine-7/31/2000
5170The other poster kept posting non-belief in response to my posts and clearly shoJGoren-7/31/2000
5169JGoren, You seem quite self-confident in your knowledge of the relationship betbc_mack-7/30/2000
5168your dreaming. TXN can't make 3G chips without Qualcomm license, and spincoJGoren-7/29/2000
5167Last I knew, TI had a patent or two also. Like I said, I'm not sure exactlybc_mack-7/29/2000
5166Sue spinco? Get real. TXN sues spinco and it has to defend against Qualcomm anJGoren-7/29/2000
5165I, for one, have enjoyed the interchange re QCOM & TXN... It has addressed bc_mack-7/29/2000
5164Part of my point is that TXN cannot expect to obtain a license to manufacture chJGoren-7/29/2000
5163kumar:This a problem of wording. In order for TXN to use any of Qualcomm's gdichaz-7/28/2000
5162Chaz, your point on QCOM's strength is understood. If TXN licenses from QCOMkumar-7/28/2000
5161kumar: While this discussion is between you and JGoren, perhaps I could help clagdichaz-7/28/2000
5160from all I've read, the impression I get is : -QCOM is a IPR/patent royalty kumar-7/28/2000
5159believe me, spinco can't authorize TXN to make cdma chips. Message 14116499JGoren-7/28/2000
5158way i understand the situation, where TXN is an ASIC manufacturer, *IF* TXN decikumar-7/28/2000
5157TXN would need its license from Qualcomm. Spinco will be the chip manufacturer.JGoren-7/28/2000
5156whilst I agree with all u state, I am not able to conclude, (u apparently are), kumar-7/28/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News