SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CYPOST (POST) Data Encryption
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
77 5 0
Emcee:  Ice Cube Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
52 Wow! 50% return in less than 2 days. Just wish more shares were available yeslindend-10/1/1999
51 Falling off a cliff is right. What an intraday chart that is. Too bad I couldnQ.-10/1/1999
50 This is hilarious. The stock is falling off the cliff, just as predicted (exceEric Fader-10/1/1999
49 All roles for Montalban Kelly Shane EIT ENVIRONMENT IMPACT TECH * was discsurelock-9/30/1999
48 Often with these pumped-up stocks, the first little hint of weakness immediatelEric Fader-9/30/1999
47 barrowstreet appears to be different from the other two. Domain registration iQ.-9/30/1999
46 quantumstocks and stocklaunch reports are identical, and include identical discQ.-9/30/1999
45 Both stocklaunch.com and quantumstocks.com contain the BarrowStreet profile on caly-9/30/1999
44 Barrowstreet is a paid tout. Companies pay them to write research reports, whicQ.-9/30/1999
43 Does anyone know anything about this outfit?? barrowstreet.com Click on the caly-9/30/1999
42 Chart is finally showing signs of weakness. Volume had stopped growing, and yesQ.-9/30/1999
41 Thanks, Caly. Looks to me like they must be focusing all their attention on POEric Fader-9/29/1999
40 From posters on Raging Bull... quantumstocks.com stocklaunch.com ragingbull.caly-9/29/1999
39 Does anyone know who these promoters are and if they're in Vancouver? ItNextnet-9/29/1999
38 These promoters are doing an amazing job, inflating this thing far beyond what Eric Fader-9/28/1999
37 J. oil, I'll tell you what I think. If you re-arrange the letters of POSTQ.-9/28/1999
36 I would suggest calling the company and reading the other side of the book. YouIce Cube-9/27/1999
35 Ice Cube after you posted on the Jaws thread I decided to do a little home workj.oil-9/27/1999
34 IceCube, I didn't appreciate the ISP angle. I think an ISP customer is worQ.-9/23/1999
33 Sorry for the way I laid into you... I think it's best to read theri press Ice Cube-9/23/1999
32 Daniel Miller speaking of red flags ... hmmm ..., but it is good of you to comeBoddington-9/23/1999
31 You seem to have a mistaken idea about what I do, Ice Cube. I don't "tQ.-9/23/1999
30 O.K., then short it !!!! Let's see what you got... I'll watch the tape Ice Cube-9/23/1999
29 Daniel, you are right: POST has many red flags. Here's my take: As a shortQ.-9/23/1999
28 I guess this thing isn't over like I thought... I knew this chart was nice Daniel Miller-9/22/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):