SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTS - Integrated Systems
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
327 10 0 INTS
Emcee:  Vijay Mehta Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
52 thanks for the update paul, now let's get on with earning in excess of $.60Sedohr Nod-11/25/1996
51 Actually, the charge should be approximately .13 or .14 after taxes, which shoupaul kim-11/25/1996
50 This does sound like good news... Ends the uncertainty now. That is a charge Dennis Kelly-11/25/1996
49 Skeleton out of the closet. For long term holders, this should be good news bepaul kim-11/25/1996
48 I bought in a few days ago at 19.5 and think that it will go up again soon. I richard Moss-11/21/1996
47 Don, hang on to this one. The "bounce" and the "slow drift in sepaul kim-11/21/1996
46 I had a hard time buying the stock during the axe murder phase last week, but dSedohr Nod-11/20/1996
45 To all: Here is a SEC article I found in the Houston Chronicle businesDan Ross-11/13/1996
44 I do not see BAY's scenario occuring with INTS. 1)INTS cannot touch BAYpaul kim-11/12/1996
43 Good luck at the bell. You probably will be laughing on your way to the bank ipaul kim-11/12/1996
42 If $18 is a great long-term buying opportunity, then how about 15 7/8. I reallyTracey R. Lanthier Jr.-11/12/1996
41 Good Afternoon(?) Paul, Good to hear from you reg. analyst's opinion on theParesh Patel-11/12/1996
40 Hopefully, this will make the market makers stop laughing soon. OAKLAND, Califpaul kim-11/12/1996
39 As long as RSYS wins large contracts such as INTC, they will do well. However paul kim-11/11/1996
38 I agree that it would be unwise to sell INTS at this point. Very often before Zeepascal-11/11/1996
37 ANALYST'S REVISED ESTIMATES CS Bank Boston .13 from .18 for Q3, .19 from paul kim-11/11/1996
36 I also hoped that this was a market over-reaction. But, looking at one more prParesh Patel-11/11/1996
35 There are probably some logical reasons why 1) the price dropped on low volume,Rich Benjamin-11/10/1996
34 Many stocks that tank significantly on what appears to be mildly bad news oftenZeepascal-11/10/1996
33 Between insider and institution holdings, INTS has practically no float. WhereRamsey Su-11/10/1996
32 I hate H&Q analyses...my broker says they aren't well regarded in the iDontin Wang-11/10/1996
31 I agree, this issue has been oversold on the news release. I spoke with the repaul kim-11/8/1996
30 I'm with you Rich. If you are a long term investor in INTS this could be a Mike Mercker-11/8/1996
29 I agree with you Tracey, INTS is oversold. I don't see any reason for thisRich Benjamin-11/8/1996
28 I agree Bill, when I bought it there was only 650000 shares traded and I cant Tracey R. Lanthier Jr.-11/8/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News