SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread.
An SI Board Since May 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5425 102 0
Emcee:  Shoot1st Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5200The Judge made that clear in the first few weeks of the trial. 11/09/05 ... Butravenseye-12/5/2005
5199Poor anthony still crying about the verdict. Bottom line,he could have told the nowandthen-12/5/2005
5198That is a fair analysis. The interest exists; nobody is manufacturing it.SI Dave-12/5/2005
5197He deserves a fair trial and fair sentencing. And there is interest in the storySmiling Bob-12/5/2005
5196In its simplest form, you could say that keeping the topic alive makes good busiSmiling Bob-12/5/2005
5195There is one occasional poster who can shed a LOT of light onto the inordinate rSmiling Bob-12/5/2005
5194I've only read parts of the transcript but that particular passage seems to rrufff-12/5/2005
51936393 1 A F T E R N O O N S E S S I O N 2 (Judge Deravenseye-12/5/2005
51925846 2 MR. LEVINE: What happened when Mr. Elgindy -- 3 if they wanted toravenseye-12/5/2005
5191<i>>>how can one be ambivalent about a criminal getting caught and cSI Dave-12/4/2005
5190I'm curious; how can one be ambivalent about a criminal getting caught and cThe Philosopher-12/4/2005
5189Thanks for your comment. I originally posted that simply as a reputable stock dThe Philosopher-12/4/2005
5188<i>>>An honest reading of your post says that you were ambivalent NOSI Dave-12/4/2005
5187Hi Philosopher, As a long time SI poster, I resent your reference to SI as a &quTommy Hicks-12/4/2005
5186<i>He had a knack causing controversy in many different areas of the site.The Philosopher-12/4/2005
5185<i>Once again, the post which you found "curious" was regarding The Philosopher-12/4/2005
5184<i>>>But I'm just curious, since you've know Elgindy on thisSI Dave-12/4/2005
5183Once again, the post which you found "curious" was regarding the widesSI Dave-12/4/2005
5182This is NOT an accusation, either direct or implied, since I have no idea whetheThe Philosopher-12/4/2005
5181Thanks for the linguistics lesson. But I'm not sure why you think you needeThe Philosopher-12/4/2005
5180Interesting. Do you find it curious that I have an ambivalent opinion simply becSI Dave-12/4/2005
5179SI Admin (Dave) wrote: <i> Obviously there are many SI members having conThe Philosopher-12/4/2005
5178Link correction for my previous post about Quash granted yesterday! lma(zz)o HOravenseye-12/3/2005
5177How many court cases were filed against yahoo MTXX posters jefFREY by the attornravenseye-12/3/2005
5176That looks like a sure cure for his syndrome of having too much time on his hanravenseye-12/2/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News