SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
522 Wade, I tend to agree. The way in which we moved to $7/share was not too unreaDouglas V. Fant-5/25/1997
521 Doug, We should hit $10 by the next earning report which should be around the eWade-5/24/1997
520 Tim, Indeed. Coverage of NANO is slim to non-existant. COHU by the way in ZackDouglas V. Fant-5/24/1997
519 jbn3, We've stalled on our run up just short of the last trading high. It Douglas V. Fant-5/24/1997
518 Doug, this weeks Barron's had a good article on semi-equipment stocks makinHiram Walker-5/24/1997
517 Hmmm, Might be an opportune time to pick up a couple more shares... jbn3jbn3-5/23/1997
516 milton, Okie dokie- here's your data, but it's a bit old and reflects Douglas V. Fant-5/23/1997
515 milton, i do not know. tha tinformation is available through a database calledDouglas V. Fant-5/23/1997
514 Doug F. Thanks for the lead. I checked the note at techstocks.com This conmilton-5/23/1997
513 milton, You'll love this: April Semiconductor BTB came out and the test seDouglas V. Fant-5/22/1997
512 milton, I agree. My guess is that we'll get a 5% or so selloff in the geneDouglas V. Fant-5/20/1997
511 Doug F. Tomorrow is when they FED announces the rate. The market seems to amilton-5/19/1997
510 Christopher, Will do! I just checked Zack's and there's nothing yet- bDouglas V. Fant-5/19/1997
509 Doug, Thanks for the info. If you see any details regarding the Zack's covChristopher Brainard-5/19/1997
508 Gang, I may have stumbled upon part of the reason for the good near-term perfoDouglas V. Fant-5/18/1997
507 milton, NANO even "swam against the tide" today. it may be demand orDouglas V. Fant-5/17/1997
506 Doug F. NANO shows continued product development. See biz.yahoo.com The recmilton-5/17/1997
505 Wade, Agreed- I feel that the market has already "priced in" a 25 baDouglas V. Fant-5/16/1997
504 Thanks all for your comments and insights. It's gratifying that the stock AJ Weissman-5/16/1997
503 Doug, I do not think a samll interest rate hike can make much damage to NANO onWade-5/15/1997
502 Peter and Ron, I used to work at that Motorola facility in Tempe, Az..... I stDouglas V. Fant-5/15/1997
501 We have more news... businesswire.comrustyjack-5/15/1997
500 Volume picking up again today; looks like some more buying.Peter Goss-5/15/1997
499 milton, I would believe that the May 20th Fed meeting, although not of tremendDouglas V. Fant-5/15/1997
498 Doug F. The momentum is building on NANO. Other news shows a 17% increase milton-5/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):