SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Organogenesis ORG
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1223 7 0 ORG
Emcee:  Rick Strange Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
523 bob, I like Sturza and think ORG will have problems making apligraf a cmmercialaknahow-2/1/1998
522 I agree with most of yr remarks. Also you refer to the Sturza Friday self defenMDS-2/1/1998
521 I am neither long or short ORG as all of my money is tied up in Ligand PharmaceArthur Radley-2/1/1998
520 I find some of these studies interesting, but not significant. Here is the reaRobert Florin-2/1/1998
519 Chris, It was apparent that you were venting your spleen toward someone else. IRick Strange-2/1/1998
518 i did not say the product was "so wonderful." In fact, I did not commLabrador-2/1/1998
517 Jane Shea: VERY WELL SAID I am not an investor in ORG one way or the other. I Don W Stone-2/1/1998
516 I was at the FDA panel and it should be noted that there was unanimous approvaMDS-2/1/1998
515 Dear Rick: First off I really want to apologize to you directly. I have really Jane Shea-2/1/1998
514 If the product were so wonderful, why was the FDA vote 5-4?David S.-2/1/1998
513 The barrons lead article (alan abelson) really pissed on ORG. I cannot understLabrador-2/1/1998
512 Cacaito, The end points were: 1) improving the incident of ulcer closure and/orRick Strange-2/1/1998
511 FDA panel probably decided based on equivalent results for both apligraft(new iCacaito-2/1/1998
510 Jane Shea's Husband, Your pomposity is only exceeded by your pious intoleraRick Strange-2/1/1998
509 Rick, thank you for the clarification (venous vs diabetic ulcers). Cacaito-2/1/1998
508 ORG probably believe in including those patients and probably believe that the Cacaito-2/1/1998
507 "Protect your principal". Will you please stop posting this phrase. IJane Shea-2/1/1998
506 Cacaito, If the indication for Regranex is for venous ulcers only then it will Rick Strange-2/1/1998
505 Rick, I think this is the post you wanted copied from Yahoo msg: <- PrevioSlim Pickens-2/1/1998
504 Regranex, FDA approved Gel for venous ulcers, from J&J is a big competitor Cacaito-2/1/1998
503 I have posted on the Yahoo Message Board under ORG additional information that Rick Strange-2/1/1998
502 "Total cost way in favor of Apligraft". Please provide evidence of thCacaito-2/1/1998
501 Compression over Apligraft most probably will reduce efficacy. It is a very delCacaito-2/1/1998
500 Paul, "N was i believe 0.17 if I recall correctly". Incorrect. The &Cacaito-2/1/1998
499 Paul FDA recommendation is not assurance of the Insurance companies paying for Cacaito-2/1/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):