SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
York Research (YORK)
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
800 7 0 YORK
Emcee:  Mark Johnson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
525 Careyn, I guess we're all using our last sap of energy to hold onto this stRichard Jaslow-4/24/1998
524 I see everybody has stopped talking. We want to see action. I believe after theCAREYN-4/22/1998
523 Is that medal a Purple Heart? :-) I don't understand why it takes a compaJim Schnereger-4/14/1998
522 We should get a medal for holding onto this stock. Looks like nothing will happCAREYN-4/14/1998
521 NEW YORK, April 8 /PRNewswire/ -- TrizecHahn (NYSE: TZH - news), a leading realJim Schnereger-4/8/1998
520 No doubt new projects are great. My only point is that, IMHO, YORK needs to esJames Hutton-4/4/1998
519 Jon, Yes, Beningson did say that he was comfortable with the FY 99 estimates. GRichard Jaslow-4/4/1998
518 Richard, Thanks. That's interesting. I think Benningson said in an interJames Hutton-4/4/1998
517 Jonathan, There is a post on the Yahoo board stating that a H.D. Brous report dRichard Jaslow-4/4/1998
516 CAREYN, Didn't you have access at one time to a report from DH Brous?? DoJames Hutton-4/4/1998
515 What we need is a stock buy-back. If the stock stays this cheap, it is the bestCAREYN-4/3/1998
514 Gunther, Thanks again for the information. Do you know if York will be directTed Jucevic-4/2/1998
513 Ted, we both plead ignorance as to if York has any excess capacity to sell on tJim Schnereger-4/2/1998
512 All: The run up in York may be due to these reasons: 1. It was in a deeply overGunther Karger-4/1/1998
511 Unfortunatly, I don't know.Ted Jucevic-4/1/1998
510 Ted, does York have any excess capacity it can sell? JimJim Schnereger-4/1/1998
509 I am guessing as to what caused the run up also. I noticed that April 1st someTed Jucevic-4/1/1998
508 I don't know Ted. That seems like a bit of a reach. But, what do I know - mJim Schnereger-4/1/1998
507 I almost forgot to mention this. The run up in YORK on March 31st, 1998 may haTed Jucevic-4/1/1998
506 Paul, thanks for the web address. In addition to the impending deregulation I Jim Schnereger-3/31/1998
505 And already twice it's average daily volume. [eom]SnakeInATuxedo-3/31/1998
504 April issue of Popular Science magazine has a 4 page article about power dereguPaul K-3/31/1998
503 When the $6 mil is included in the earnings is it taxed first, and if so (guessTed Jucevic-3/30/1998
502 Ted, you did not include the first quarterly installment of operating income frGunther Karger-3/30/1998
501 In the Management's Discussion (Jan 14th, 1998) it is mentioned that they rTed Jucevic-3/30/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News