SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
George Gilder - Forbes ASAP
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5853 405 0
Emcee:  Brad Rogers Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5278Right, we agree there. I think Reagan compromised in order to accomplish what hDan B.-11/11/2000
5277I didn't say Reagan wasn't as responsible for the spending as the congrewillcousa-11/11/2000
5276Re: "I believe Reagan decided to accept greater domestic spending from CongDan B.-11/10/2000
5275Even worse, one of the big three news anchors is a furiner.willcousa-11/8/2000
5274HEADLINE S/B "CBS AND DAN RATHER SCREW UP ELECTION" CORRECTION: "greedsgd_2000-11/8/2000
5273I did not see that post. If I had I would have stopped. I don't think thatwillcousa-11/8/2000
5272dovewinds.comRinConRon-11/8/2000
5271CORRECTION -BUSH WINS -GREAT NEWS FOR BIOTECH INNOVATION liberal media networksgreedsgd_2000-11/8/2000
5270Will wrote: >>I am more than happy to do that. I thought that we zebraspot-11/7/2000
5269Lesson is: scaring seniors works - don't touch that third rail social securigreedsgd_2000-11/7/2000
5268It all concludes in a few hours. Got any Pepto-Bismal? TPTigerPaw-11/7/2000
5267Yea guys, we are getting sick of all this political crap on the George Gilder thwillcousa-11/7/2000
5266Hey guys, this is the Gilder thread. Take your political crap elsewhere.Sector Investor-11/7/2000
5265<i>We have gone over this many times. Clinton's ``surplus'' waTigerPaw-11/7/2000
5264We have gone over this many times. Clinton's ``surplus'' was accomplBernard Levy-11/7/2000
5263Pussy Foot, bring on the test!willcousa-11/7/2000
5262<i>The question is who is willing to act on it</i> That's easy. TigerPaw-11/7/2000
5261Don't forget LPTH as a possible Mention in the next report.john722-11/7/2000
5260Well, Tiger - It is a fact. The question is who is willing to act on it. Your willcousa-11/7/2000
5259<i>it could take a lot less to run the Federal portion of this country'TigerPaw-11/7/2000
5258Actually, Pussy Foot, it could take a lot less to run the Federal portion of thiwillcousa-11/7/2000
5257<i>founding fathers had a flat tax </i> No, they had a property tax TigerPaw-11/7/2000
5256Our founding fathers had a flat tax and the idea of an income tax was ruled uncowillcousa-11/7/2000
5255<i>Why is taxing more than someone needs at a higher rate fair?</i> TigerPaw-11/7/2000
5254Why is taxing more than someone needs at a higher rate fair? So could you agreeFollies-11/7/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News