SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Superconductor Technologies : SCON
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
903 41 0 SCON
Emcee:  Marshall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
528 Huge momentum reversal today. Stock should retrace about 50% of its recent gainshrtslr-2/29/2000
527 scon found support in the low 80s!Robert Rose-2/29/2000
526 OT --- Interesting, I never have seen you post something like that before. Btsunami-2/29/2000
525 i forgot about the massive rush to the doors by the insiders.Brasco One-2/29/2000
524 <!>I would think that 50 would be a good place to cover some...but not alBrasco One-2/29/2000
523 I would think that 50 would be a good place to cover some...but not all.big run-2/29/2000
522 no...its our turn. we got 75,,,then some calls...50 comin... imo, donBrasco One-2/29/2000
521 Donny and all shorts, do NOT cover prematurely. The momentum has turned south.Tom Hua-2/29/2000
520 TIMBER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Brasco One-2/29/2000
519 Liquid nitrogen evaporating, filters are no longer superconducting. Regards, Tom Hua-2/29/2000
518 Pyramid is collapsing. Waiting to cover when it gets to the 50s. Should be a nStreet Hawk-2/29/2000
517 momo leaving SCON! 91 now. The whole sector tanks -- CDTS, ISCOallen menglin chen-2/29/2000
516 Looks like the air has been let out of the balloon!!!shrtslr-2/29/2000
515 hey brasco...i am going to throw my refrigerator box away.. you are now safe...BigTex-2/29/2000
514 <i>SCON is the AMZN of superconductors w/o the revenue.</i> Why doStreet Hawk-2/29/2000
513 SCON is much worse, per recent 10Q, they sell customers $3.5 worth of filter foTom Hua-2/29/2000
512 >They make it up in volume< It reminds me of that old Saturday Night Livshrtslr-2/29/2000
511 Tom, They make it up in volume <g>Art M-2/29/2000
510 shrtslr, on top of that SCON is selling those filters substantially below cost.Tom Hua-2/29/2000
509 Tom, I stand corrected! I was trying to give SCON the benifit of doubt and usinshrtslr-2/29/2000
508 shrtslr, actually U.S. Cellular pays about $18,000 for a filter. Its order forTom Hua-2/29/2000
507 SCON looks weak this AM.allen menglin chen-2/29/2000
506 The term "HTS" is classifying the alloys they use and their particulaMarshall-2/29/2000
505 It is a high-temperature filter relative to previous filters, however, the amouStreet Hawk-2/29/2000
504 Let me guess - you can't read? suptech.com Guess the memory of my researchMarshall-2/29/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News