SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Jim's Nasdaq100 Special as a basket.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2103 37 0 QQQQ
Emcee:  James F. Hopkins Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
528 Jamie ; I just sent you a PM going into more detail. James F. Hopkins-4/24/1999
527 I don't know what it means either but I just have to believe it is all partMonty Lenard-4/24/1999
526 Monty: Yes you are right. This must mean something and I just can't place iCompadre-4/24/1999
525 Hi Again! 59% is the latest bullish percent figures for the QQQ chartseer chartseer-4/24/1999
524 Update NDX Percent aboveLes H-4/24/1999
523 I added the 5-day RSI and 5-day Stochastic to my statistical report on momentumLes H-4/24/1999
522 HI Vitus; Yes in checking it I also found it could be false, so I don't likJames F. Hopkins-4/24/1999
521 LOL; There is a sort or irony to confusing myself , now after catching myself aJames F. Hopkins-4/24/1999
520 Jaime, I think everything is an internet stock these days. Have you looked at Monty Lenard-4/24/1999
519 "that takes the cake when you can confuse yourself , and I think I just dMonty Lenard-4/24/1999
518 Who's got a 60min NDX and QQQ P&F? That should be neat looking. Eric?Stoctrash-4/24/1999
517 Jim, I think that XMT is the 10 highest yielders of the Dow, or, in other wordsVitas-4/24/1999
516 Jim: Yes I did read your article. And I Must say it is a good one. You have putCompadre-4/24/1999
515 Monty: <<Even IBM looked like an internet stock yesterday.>> LOL, bCompadre-4/24/1999
514 Hi Monty; wasn't that IBM a blast, the old shorts covered then more jumped James F. Hopkins-4/24/1999
513 Jim, I am uploading those charts now for you. I had enough history to go back Monty Lenard-4/23/1999
512 How difficult would it be to switch to an NDX , and S&P500 Mc. ? I have enMonty Lenard-4/23/1999
511 Monty ; I see it now, my mistake, How difficult would it be to switch to an NDXJames F. Hopkins-4/23/1999
510 Jim, still fighting the problems I sent you via PM the other day. Looking at oMonty Lenard-4/23/1999
509 Monty ; What have you been up to ? BTW if you have time check, and follow the lJames F. Hopkins-4/23/1999
508 Jamie: I believe it, as I also have a buy signal ( very short term ) and it donJames F. Hopkins-4/23/1999
507 Jim: Believe it or not I still have a buy signal as of right now. I has been onCompadre-4/23/1999
506 Hi Les; Thanx ; & I'm with you , I think the internals improved from whJames F. Hopkins-4/23/1999
505 He has a huge range for the target: 11000 - 12000. He's expecting the othLes H-4/23/1999
504 He states he is a bear , but thinks we could make Dow 12000 before we tank, theJames F. Hopkins-4/23/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News