SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Pangea Goldfields T.PGD
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1178 7 0 PGD
Emcee:  Larry Voyer Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
528 You got itRobert-11/23/1999
527 A few points - the PP was above market price - and the right of first refusal oEnigma-11/22/1999
526 I think you should consider the current climate for juniors. It is prudent to rRobert-11/22/1999
525 tb: As I stated in a previous post, I believe there has to be something else gTerry Swift-11/21/1999
524 Ari, some ideas. I find it intriguing that months of discussion/negotiations btimbouctou-11/21/1999
523 AriKira, Aha! You stated "FYI I sold all my shares during the last run Syncrude-11/20/1999
522 Maybe the funds will be used for an aggressive drilling program allowing the coAriKirA-11/20/1999
521 AriKirA, As I have stated before, I think Pangea will do well. Where we diffeSyncrude-11/20/1999
520 Syncrude, They could have done the PP at a discount but decided to add a premiAriKirA-11/20/1999
519 Really appreciate your input timbouctou Just curious... Are you in any way invAriKirA-11/20/1999
518 timbouctou, I agree with your assessment. The deal has put a $4 cap on the shSyncrude-11/20/1999
517 "But... is it really that bad for PGD shareholders? I actually find it quitimbouctou-11/20/1999
516 Exactly salva That was my point (kind of a rhetorical question)! Some people oAriKirA-11/19/1999
515 .....< Barrick did learn the hard way last time. Can't blame them for trsalva-11/19/1999
514 <i>but no management is going to put in the annual report - "this isAriKirA-11/18/1999
513 "A premature sale would undervalue the company" I agree - and a smarEnigma-11/18/1999
512 DD: Poison pills rarely deter a determined suitor and I don't expect PangeTerry Swift-11/18/1999
511 Have you ever seen a poison pill of this kind actually put into effect? I spokEnigma-11/17/1999
510 We seem to be at cross purposes - of course an annual report is what it is - anEnigma-11/17/1999
509 Yes Terry....They clearly state in their annual reports that their aim is to deRobert-11/17/1999
508 Robert: I've stated a similar opinion in the past but you and I are the onTerry Swift-11/17/1999
507 <<<<<<. If you have bought Pangea shares, you are betting on salva-11/17/1999
506 An annual report is an audited statement of fact. It is all in there. You thinkRobert-11/17/1999
505 You don't suppose they would be so crass as to put that in an annual reportEnigma-11/17/1999
504 Try reading their annual reports from the last couple of years....Robert-11/17/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):