SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Superconductor Technologies : SCON
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
903 41 0 SCON
Emcee:  Marshall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
53 Wafa: I know we all want to be positive in this bear market for small tech stocarun gera-4/5/1997
52 This announcement and AMSC's announcement of a stake by Electricite De FranWafa SHIHABI-4/4/1997
51 News! "Superfilter" trials: Superconductor Technologies reports resuHubert Few-4/2/1997
50 To everyone, I was poking through reading SCON SEC filings and noted that LockDonald Isenhower-3/22/1997
49 Tony: At this point, it is not even clear whether the superconducting filters arun gera-3/7/1997
48 Arun- Thanks. Your info helps get me started with fewer misconceptions. I wiTony Grier-3/6/1997
47 Conductus and Lucent Conductus, Lucent, IBM, and SCON are part of a superconduarun gera-3/6/1997
46 Dick- I saw some cdts references to Lucent. Thanks for telling me Lucent is ATTony Grier-3/6/1997
45 : I also need to research AT&T's intentions in : building their proposeDick Oliver-3/6/1997
44 Thomas- Although pretty new to this stock, now 24 hours , yesterday I did giveTony Grier-3/4/1997
43 You know, years ago Apple was a big draw at one of these industry conventions.Thomas Lee-3/4/1997
42 Sorry about that- This looks better and has the full story. SuTony Grier-3/3/1997
41 News posted today on scon. Thought I could leave it here. Just passing throughTony Grier-3/3/1997
40 It is not impossible for your "Techi" guy to gear up. In deed he mustWafa SHIHABI-2/28/1997
39 : What capital injections, and what dilution are we going to need : to see befoDick Oliver-2/28/1997
38 Thanks for the post... I will keep adding on too.... regards,nein na-2/28/1997
37 Dick, I believe you have it just right on most accounts. Superconductivity, is Wafa SHIHABI-2/28/1997
36 I've been watching the superconductor stocks for a while, and here's myDick Oliver-2/27/1997
35 Donald, thank you for your well written and factual reply to my cynical post. Ijbershad-2/23/1997
34 Edge, Well I've been poking around tonight and did find reference from theDonald Isenhower-2/21/1997
33 Edge, I've read Marshall's posts here and that's one of the reasonDonald Isenhower-2/20/1997
32 Donald- Thanks for the lengthy reply, I would ignore Jerry if I were you. I neAlan Edgett-2/20/1997
31 Jerry, Well I'm not trying to impress anybody, but I'll comment on youDonald Isenhower-2/20/1997
30 Donald, You do not impress me. Look up the work Lucent technlogies is doing chajbershad-2/19/1997
29 >A superconductor in theory has no resistance to current. > accordiDonald Isenhower-2/17/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News