SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Theragenics (TGX) on the up and up
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1055 2 0 TGX
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
530 Hmmm..They have 4 cyclos now..they add 1 per qtr.and by yearend have 8..their cbill hopkins-9/21/1997
529 Thanks for the update. Interesting that their online version just updated a cRon Kline-9/21/1997
528 Just received my issue of SSR (Individual Investor's newsletter) and they aMichael Paul Langley-9/21/1997
527 Yes I think so also. I have a mental stop at $40 so the big guys don't scooRon Kline-9/20/1997
526 In technicals the fundamental axiom is 'volume goes with the trend'. IJim Roof-9/20/1997
525 Ron, I think $40 will hold. The stock has been under heavy accumulation durinJeffrey Beckman-9/20/1997
524 Looked it up and it's $20 bucks now. Seems like it was the few weeks ago tRon Kline-9/19/1997
523 thrx investors: i suggested thrx investors to invest in nasi at 9/sh a few weekrichard houchin-9/19/1997
522 Hope THRX stays above $40...I'm not ready to depart ship just yet.Ron Kline-9/18/1997
521 What I am picking up from your post is that the demand is much greater than eveRon Kline-9/17/1997
520 Thank you for the information. This is a feasible explaination of the recent rJM-9/17/1997
519 Thanks Miles for the input. I guess Smith Barney - one of their underwriters - dfloydr-9/17/1997
518 THRX "pre-announced" a strong qtr in an analyst call on 9/12. Smith BMiles Rhyne Hoffman, CFA-9/15/1997
517 Ron, Sorry for the confusion. I was discussing a technical indicator, "Jeffrey Beckman-9/15/1997
516 Jeffrey, Can you explain what you are talking about. Why are you selling THRXRon Kline-9/15/1997
515 All: Telechart 2000's, "Balance of Power" indicator of accumulatJeffrey Beckman-9/15/1997
514 I agree with you there for certain. However, let's assume that the J&JJim Roof-9/15/1997
513 "From a trading perspective it's fun to have a hyped stock but fromdfloydr-9/15/1997
512 I know the feeling! I had a couple thousand shares from early 1996 that I soldJim Roof-9/15/1997
511 Excellent commentary. To which I would add: 1. When they ordered the cyclotrodfloydr-9/15/1997
510 THRX normally posts earnings around the 21st give or take a few days..anybody kbill hopkins-9/15/1997
509 > As I recall, THRX first raised prices for the seeds before > theRoy Travis-9/15/1997
508 I agree. Still think that with this momentum we could see 50. I am not sure wJim Roof-9/14/1997
507 Jim: Perhaps the stock price is up in anticipation of expected revenues due to JM-9/14/1997
506 As I recall, part of the agreement stipulated that THRX be able to keep up withJim Roof-9/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):