SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
534 Boon, Good point but all posts/news prior to merger say appropriate USRX value Michael Shumberger-3/2/1997
533 Disagree Tom, if you buy USRX you own USRX until the merger is done. Anything cLarry S.-3/2/1997
532 An interesting post, Michael, although I would be more excited about if BriefinBoon-3/2/1997
531 Dwight, while I don't share your enthusiasm, I hope you're right in makTulvio Durand-3/2/1997
530 Bill We sure hear statements like this more and more lately............. <Scrapps-3/2/1997
529 Thomas, Thanks for some supporting data. USRX is BIG on the ISP side. Check Price Monger-3/2/1997
528 Just got this: BRIEFING recommending USRX and COMS as FAVORITES! Says network sMichael Shumberger-3/2/1997
527 Scrapps: Thanks for the URL. This is the first time I read the article. WSTL&bill c.-3/2/1997
526 Thomas, <i>COMPUSA doesn't even have accounts with Rockwell, and wonDavid Lawrence-3/2/1997
525 Just talked to a COMPUSA rep, he said 70% of all providers use USRX connectionsthomas hayden-3/2/1997
524 IBD article, "Computers & Technology" section. My comment on theDwight E. Karlsen-3/2/1997
523 a re-post of the USR Hybrid 56K/ADSL modem article. techstocks.comScrapps-3/2/1997
522 David, No, I wouldn't like to reconsider my statements. Either way, you&#damniseedemons-3/2/1997
521 Remember, if you buy USRX, you don't really own USRX, you own 3COM. 3COM lthomas hayden-3/2/1997
520 Too many damn messages on this forum. Takes too long to download. I NEED A BETMichael Shumberger-3/2/1997
519 Tech Me, and others, about why USRX trades for < 1.75 COMS: there seems toJoel R. Phillips-3/2/1997
518 Alfredo: Mass deployment of ADSL will start sometime in 1998. Both ROC/LU/MOTbill c.-3/2/1997
517 It does seem unnatural because of the volume and the about of negative thoughtTech Me Home-3/2/1997
516 Reason value(USRX) < 1.75 * value(COMS) What I have been noticing with the Tech Me Home-3/2/1997
515 usrx seems a pretty safe bet at 55. downside maybe 48 to 52, upside back to mihoww-3/2/1997
514 Now what would be a wiser buy? COMS or USRX? I`m already in with some of USRXTim85gt-3/2/1997
513 Boon, It is very confusing to know what to do. Any rational explaination for whKeith Howells-3/2/1997
512 Boon, good word of caution. We would all do well in waiting until the dust settAlfredo Nova-3/2/1997
511 To ALL: The more I read about the merger announcement and subsequent trading iBoon-3/2/1997
510 Simonds, forget ISDN please. Look at the article in Byte magazine by Tom HalfhiAlfredo Nova-3/2/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News