SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
uniView Technologies - UVEW
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6895 7 0 UVEW
Emcee:  emichael Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5345 TO ALL: Just finished talking to Neal Katz a short while ago. Neal basically saLenny W.-9/3/1997
5344 This new web site is lighting fast, compared to the old site. Great Job! OnlyJoe Barker-9/3/1997
5343 The website redesign is terrific. Finally. Peter, one basic thing I believe CRRick Julian-9/3/1997
5342 Lenny, my comments were strictly hypothetical, based on the premise that the stSteve Casey-9/3/1997
5341 OK, not that I have any faith that Katz or Custer will listen, but does anybodyPeter Fiala-9/3/1997
5340 For anyone that is left, the Custis Mathes web site is now in the process of upJoe Barker-9/3/1997
5339 Rick, you have pretty much summed it up. Holders beware!Joe Barker-9/3/1997
5338 Rick--I'm just catching up with SI threads and won't be fully up to speBrad Hill-9/3/1997
5337 Joe, I sympathize with your investment dilema, but understand this: WebTV has Rick Julian-9/3/1997
5336 I sent an e-mail to Mike Langberg, (Mercury News Staff Writer) for a response tJoe Barker-9/3/1997
5335 Steve, lets not jump to conclusions that the uniView is an inferior product basLenny W.-9/3/1997
5334 Then the question needs to be asked, would you as a store owner, with finite shSteve Casey-9/3/1997
5333 Perhaps too, because the reporter was giving a review on a product that is the Joe Barker-9/3/1997
5332 Joe, lets not worry about pricing right now. If they don't start getting a Lenny W.-9/3/1997
5331 Lenny, this current review reminds me of that scathing report on the uniView byJoe Barker-9/3/1997
5330 Joe, I still own all my shares. After reading the article I'm more scepticlLenny W.-9/3/1997
5329 One item that has been lost in today's upheavals has been the post from RicJoe Barker-9/3/1997
5328 Hector, How would shorting drive a price down? How can any of us have an effePeter Fiala-9/3/1997
5327 Hector, what are you getting at? This stock is not being shorted to any extent.Lenny W.-9/3/1997
5326 To All: Have any of you read the QDRX or OVIS threads. Very interesting readiHLL-9/3/1997
5325 Carl, my suggestion to others is to not hold onto this stock, if you can not afJoe Barker-9/3/1997
5324 Joe, My decision to sell today was not based soley on today's article. TheRick Julian-9/3/1997
5323 Questions, questions, questions! Geez, have you guys got questions for Neal! Jon Tara-9/3/1997
5322 Lenny, I do not know who user #1 is. I certainly would have appreciated Neal tJoe Barker-9/3/1997
5321 <b>BLEEP! BLEEP! BLEEP!!!</b> <i><<One point Neal maIKM-9/3/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News