SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5839 41 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Amboy Charlie Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5364Rachel C. Strickland, Esq. Interesting that this attorney's name appears onChuckMcCan-4/5/2008
5363First rapid glance at ASUR. 57cents a share in cash and no debt? Two officers buHal Campbell-4/5/2008
5362OFF TOPIC: Might want to check out ASUR the old FORG. Stock has been hanging archriscraft-4/5/2008
5361<<<What I can't figure out, is why they never came to the stockholdNosaj-4/3/2008
5360Thanks Hal, And I was able to pick up 1,950 more at the close. I have more thaHarvey H Anderson-4/3/2008
5359Another 465,000 shares traded today! Surely this is flipping as I think we'vOPVet-4/3/2008
5358Bold Ploy, Harvey! Hope it works out very well... Classic Ampex still, isn'Hal Campbell-4/3/2008
5357declaring bankrupcy was one way to keep Value Vest off the board. lol.wvbuild 06-4/3/2008
5356Gotta admit you got spunk to take the risk, thing is with ampx, don't know wDAMNEDIFYOUDO-4/3/2008
5355I generally am very dismissive of folks who plaster tattoos all over their body,OPVet-4/3/2008
5354Hi Hal, About 31K of that opening flurry was me. I figured, in for an inch, iHarvey H Anderson-4/3/2008
5353I still would like to know what Commercial Strategy has to say about the patentsmamenikr-4/3/2008
5352Class action lawsuits are all that's left, and they are a sign of vigor. In fuddled-4/3/2008
5351I'm sorry, Op but we all survived Ampex............there oughtta be a tattHal Campbell-4/2/2008
5350I think many of us did the same thing as you I unfortunately did and got smoked.chriscraft-4/2/2008
5349Hal, I'm totally sick about this, although I think if people read my poOPVet-4/2/2008
5348Sounds like Hillside is gonna end up with at least half of the new private shareDAMNEDIFYOUDO-4/2/2008
5347The only way out of this I can imagine is what I assumed (should never assume wiHal Campbell-4/2/2008
5346Oh no question, WV. You are exactly right. If the royalties ever come through iHal Campbell-4/2/2008
5345the problem with this as I see it is this, if they hit on a patent or two after wvbuild 06-4/2/2008
5344James, in the light of day I now think you are, on balance, more correct about HHal Campbell-4/2/2008
5343Yeah, I guess, Paul. They could have done the essentials of this deal without goHal Campbell-4/2/2008
5342They had to do the ch 11 to leggally ram it thruPaul Lee-4/2/2008
5341Oh I <b>did</b> miss something obvious. Thought so. Sorry. HillsidHal Campbell-4/2/2008
5340This deal.....what I don't understand at all about it is WHY it requires theHal Campbell-4/2/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):