SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
BAY Ntwks (under House)
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6980 8 0 BAY
Emcee:  Beachbumm Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5380 Gary, trouble is - you're obviously right with your opinion about BAY. I rJurgen-4/17/1998
5379 How many times have I seen this same story? Company and industry has 2 or 3 quw2j2-4/17/1998
5378 Thread: A few additional snippets from the CC (the morning after the night berupert1-4/17/1998
5377 Dear Victor: Let us break bread together on our knees, on our knees. JDNJDN-4/17/1998
5376 Dear Paul: Thank you for your thoughtful report on the CC. I am curious, do yJDN-4/17/1998
5375 Dear Vepoc: You are correct, I verified that with my broker. JDNJDN-4/17/1998
5374 Paul, Re -- Thank You- Thank you for pointing out the obvious. Did you realizeStockMan-4/17/1998
5373 Can you please tell me which other networkers have posted strong quarters (besiJRH-4/17/1998
5372 quite a few networkers have posted very positive results. Just wanted to point Paul A-4/17/1998
5371 Gary and Stockman- I know these types of results can make tempers short, but tPaul Fine-4/17/1998
5370 Hey Gary, You amuse me. StockmanStockMan-4/17/1998
5369 I also listened to entire conference call and share the same views expressed eaFilippo Zucchi-4/17/1998
5368 Victor, I finished the cc though I have no position on BAY. This is exactely Mang Cheng-4/17/1998
5367 Thanks for the education Stockman. <i>My post said that the numbers noThe Phoenix-4/17/1998
5366 Hey Gary, Go back to the Cisco thread, where you belong. Your posts as usual haStockMan-4/17/1998
5365 Jurgen, Well, I did say that the MM's don't like uncertainty on the ASThe Phoenix-4/17/1998
5364 Thanks Victor and Paul for the CC coverage. I hope others will summarize theirRoads End-4/17/1998
5363 Gary, you made similar comments about ASND four month ago. You were wrong, ASNDJurgen-4/16/1998
5362 Paul: I listened to my first BAY CC until 3 a.m. our time. First, I must tharupert1-4/16/1998
5361 <i>The market doesn't like BAY, so my guess is they'll look at itThe Phoenix-4/16/1998
5360 <i>I think most of us are just shell shocked. I didn't expect that loThe Phoenix-4/16/1998
5359 <i>lert: BAY SEES EFFECTS OF WEAK INDUSTRY DEMAND CONTINUING IN The Phoenix-4/16/1998
5358 Oh Pierre...but STOCKMAN says it's irrelavent. I agree with you, I thinkThe Phoenix-4/16/1998
5357 Yeah Stockman, According to you this quarter is irrelevent...so was last quartThe Phoenix-4/16/1998
5356 John:The errors arise from the value you place on BAY's technology vrs the Doug-4/16/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News