SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
HITSGALORE.COM (HITT)
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7056 46 0 HITT
Emcee:  bob sims Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5381 Sure he has a choice. He can put any kind of funny assets he likes on his balanQ.-4/14/2000
5380 Serious question: <i> Dorian would lose a lot of face if he reclassifiedJanice Shell-4/14/2000
5379 lol, naturally.... New accountants?Janice Shell-4/14/2000
5378 Bob Thompson did us the favor of giving us another date to look forward to: <Q.-4/14/2000
5377 Wonder whether the auditor balked at offering an opinion on financial statementQ.-4/14/2000
5376 Nice of them to wait until after the bell to file that - gives the hypsters a cMighty_Mezz-4/14/2000
5375 Speakin' of auditors, here may be a piece of the puzzle: "FORM 8-K Sir Auric Goldfinger-4/14/2000
5374 Well, send auditors, anyway. <i> Quite a revelation from Thompson about Q.-4/13/2000
5373 I Have had a few rounds with Bob Sims over on the TMMI thread, interesting, he C E D-4/13/2000
5372 lol, yessss....Janice Shell-4/13/2000
5371 Hats off to Aaron Elstein of the WSJ for a first-rate article! That article waQ.-4/13/2000
5370 Quite a revelation from Thompson about the LFT check. ...Mezz - "Send laMighty_Mezz-4/13/2000
5369 Cybersmear' Suit Is Dropped Against Message-Board Critics By AARON ELSTEINJanice Shell-4/13/2000
5368 We were and are, in fact, a little bit pissed off that the basher suit was dismJanice Shell-4/13/2000
5367 "With prejudice" does not mean that. It means that the case is dismiKLN-4/13/2000
5366 Matched--what a coinkydink!--by renewed hyping at the RB site.Janice Shell-4/13/2000
5365 what a shame ,,,,,,,,seventy five cents and falling, where's is Boo Boo BobRMMOYER-4/13/2000
5364 I'm not a lawyer, but I'm baffled by how the lawsuit could be dismisseddumbmoney-4/13/2000
5363 I wonder which one of the filers is the "anonymous shareholder" on thMighty_Mezz-4/13/2000
5362 Absolutely do not miss this!! ragingbull.comJanice Shell-4/13/2000
5361 FILER: KOWALCZYK JAMES T TITLE: None BROKER: RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES Q.-4/13/2000
5360 FILER: GIBBONS HUGH M TITLE: None BROKER: RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES SHAQ.-4/13/2000
5359 Mezz, two of the form 144 sellers were SCMI officers. In the next two posts, IQ.-4/13/2000
5358 Sure are a lot more insiders than I'd imagined. Or should I say "wereMighty_Mezz-4/12/2000
5357 I found the Form 144 sales on Dow Jones News Retrieval. This allows copying, wQ.-4/12/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):