SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
The Left Wing Porch
An SI Board Since December 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6089 46 0
Emcee:  Poet Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
5389Hi X, Re: <i>Have you seen the Thin Red Line? </i> No, I haven&#Raymond Duray3/12/2002
5388Have you seen the Thin Red Line? One of the most beautiful anti war movies I haepicure3/12/2002
5387Hi Pat, While I won't see the movie, I did stumble upon a TV show called &Raymond Duray3/12/2002
5386THe story actually deals with the inept leadership in a manner that is probably Patricia Trinchero3/12/2002
5385Re: <i>Have you seen the movie, "We were soldiers"?</i> Raymond Duray3/11/2002
5384Ray..........you're amazing!! Have you seen the movie, "We were soldiePatricia Trinchero3/11/2002
5383Commie kids are happier: <<< But, in 1970 some sociologists did surveThomas M.3/11/2002
5382A little early for me to be there, besides being on a work day... but I'm suthames_sider3/11/2002
5381Coming Soon, to a Neighborhood near you.... bilderberg.orgRaymond Duray3/10/2002
5380Hi Pat, Speaking of rackets, are you familiar with the writing of Lt. Gen. SRaymond Duray3/9/2002
5379In George Carlin's book, "Napalm and Silly Putty", he states that Patricia Trinchero3/9/2002
5378Hi Patricia, Golly, I don't quite know what to say about that nuclear weapRaymond Duray3/9/2002
5377Secret Plan Outlines the Unthinkable A secret policy review of the nation’s nucPatricia Trinchero3/9/2002
5376The Canadian warship? ROFL, that was good. All over SI. Message 17048946 andthames_sider3/8/2002
5375ts, Very well done, I suspect your quickness to the punchlines has to do with Raymond Duray3/7/2002
5374For example, this. <i><b>GOD NAMES NEXT "CHOSEN PEOPLE"; Ithames_sider3/7/2002
5373Ah, you must mean this... Message 17126662 I'm rarely beaten to strategic hthames_sider3/7/2002
5372ts, I tried to read that Doc Bones jive on the FADG. You're missing all thRaymond Duray3/6/2002
5371The Gallup poll to which Buchanan refers certainly provided some chilling informPoet3/5/2002
5370It's a noticeably thoughtful and intelligent piece. Well done Buchanan <thames_sider3/5/2002
5369Pat Buchanan's speaking with a clarity that I would like to see more Democraksuave3/5/2002
5368But you forget that he'd never leave the witness either. He'd need BaxteRaymond Duray2/28/2002
5367It doesn't ring true. He'd have taken the shirt as well. In fact, he&#thames_sider2/28/2002
5366Re: <i>and yes I did have to check your riposte. grr. well done. </i&gRaymond Duray2/28/2002
5365The spelling alone should ensure that, even before they attempt the philosophy..thames_sider2/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News