SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5839 41 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Amboy Charlie Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5389The judge in the bankruptcy hearings is Arthur J. Gonzalez, who handled the EnroJames Feldman-4/13/2008
5388Thanks for posting that, K.Hal Campbell-4/13/2008
5387Takened from Ampex home page under BK filing it list VV(paragraph 30 ) . Can anyfuntimes_52-4/13/2008
5386This is the part I don't like at all and I wasn't going to let current mchriscraft-4/13/2008
5385folks will be able to follow this case here: ampex.com see vv has entered counskillybegs-4/12/2008
5384Nosaj , Like you (IMHO) Think they are a lot of GOOD THINGS going on with OUR DEfuntimes_52-4/11/2008
5383San Jose Mercury News, Calif., Mike Cassidy column: A valley pioneer that could Paul Lee-4/11/2008
5382IMO, this can only be good for us. Opens up more options for financing and to pNosaj-4/11/2008
5381My previous post 5327 I mentioned that,,maybe team up with V.V. and others to fiDAMNEDIFYOUDO-4/10/2008
5380Why would Fund buy into company going BK ? sec.govfuntimes_52-4/10/2008
5379WAYYY OT (but interesting) timesonline.co.uk I am sure our ampex experiences haHal Campbell-4/10/2008
5378I didn't receive your email James. Please send to me.buckosw-4/9/2008
5377What if you sold your shares, but was a long term holder before, James???.....DAMNEDIFYOUDO-4/9/2008
5376I sent my emails out yesterday and have already received responses back from manJames Feldman-4/9/2008
5375I'd like to be in contact with you, but it would be best to talk or write prJames Feldman-4/8/2008
5374I'm no legal expert, DIYD, but have been told a ruling awarding Kodak court Hal Campbell-4/7/2008
5373Does BK mean ampx is protected from a Kodak lawsuit on the 121 patent that they DAMNEDIFYOUDO-4/7/2008
5372Does this BK mean there will be no meeting ,no question's asked.or answermamenikr-4/7/2008
5371I am all the way with you duke. I have felt that way all along. That's whymamenikr-4/6/2008
5370Ampex RIP... Goodbye AXC of Delaware... 'twas the pink shirt that did it ibootsup1-4/6/2008
5369There does seem to be some crazy things going on, maybe just coincidences, we doDAMNEDIFYOUDO-4/6/2008
5368Bio of Gerard Eastman zoominfo.com.funtimes_52-4/6/2008
5367I saw that some time ago when our once great leader was trying to take over the duke of axc-4/6/2008
5366And could G. Eastman, under Sherborne, be a distant relation to the Eastman KodaDAMNEDIFYOUDO-4/6/2008
5365If I recall correctly that was me that asked that question, and yes you are 100%chriscraft-4/5/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News