SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The California Energy Crisis - Information & Forum
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1715 22 0
Emcee:  deepenergyfella Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
540<i>I've read enough of your drivel to ask you this question point blanHawkmoon-6/15/2001
539Here's a good column that places the blame in California directly where it bGVTucker-6/15/2001
538Raymond, RE: <i>Today, refinery profits are higher than they have ever bGVTucker-6/15/2001
537Gov. Gray Davis' decision this week to relax emission controls at power planBearcatbob-6/15/2001
536Hawkmoon, I've read enough of your drivel to ask you this question point bRaymond Duray-6/15/2001
535<i>internal oil industry documents show that five years ago companies wereHawkmoon-6/14/2001
534Edit...response is to Hawk's post 508 <i>but it clearly is not the moZeuspaul-6/14/2001
533(CBS) While the Bush administration cites a lack of refineries for energy shortaRon-6/14/2001
532Quincy, If the Fed takes over power, I believe that there would eventually be DavesM-6/14/2001
531The risk would be shifted not to government, but to the individual taxpayer.Father Terrence-6/14/2001
530Here's a solution for all of those nasty particulates produced by diesel genHawkmoon-6/14/2001
529Is trading an insiders game? uniontribune.comQuincy-6/14/2001
528"And we know how efficient governments are managing enterprises, don't Quincy-6/14/2001
527It just goes to show that California has tools for dealing with the electricity Hawkmoon-6/14/2001
526You know, DavesM, we might have finally hit upon a way to ranching a profitable GVTucker-6/14/2001
525Hi Hawkmoon, I like the direction you are taking with the government aiding inRaymond Duray-6/14/2001
524re: methane. You should send an email to Capstone asking them to design a microDavesM-6/14/2001
523Actually, as I recall, Sam Insull went to prison because he was a major player iHawkmoon-6/14/2001
522You know, I've always thought that the energy companies seriously need a PR GVTucker-6/14/2001
521How is that speculation? It's no different than putting increased mileage oHawkmoon-6/14/2001
520Hi Hawkmoon, Re: <i>What the state has effectively done is told their trRaymond Duray-6/14/2001
519Portage, The gaming goes in both directions. The Governor was threatening to uDavesM-6/14/2001
518Hi Vance, Things are starting to move pretty fast in the California energy sceRaymond Duray-6/14/2001
517<i>And as to the notion that the State of California needs more devious trHawkmoon-6/14/2001
516Hawk, that's a non-answer with far more speculation than the support offeredportage-6/14/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):