SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
George Gilder - Forbes ASAP
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5853 405 0
Emcee:  Brad Rogers Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5403In the January 2001 Digital Power Report ISIL is added to the listD. Chapman-1/15/2001
5402Why do you think that XLA is a fake over Mirror Image? Didn't Exodus investLabrador-1/15/2001
5401Hi, Re: "some of his stocks really rocketed off their bottoms late last wDan B.-1/15/2001
5400Ditto. That post was dreadful in its accuracy. Contrarianwise, this has got to zebraspot-1/15/2001
5399Forgive me for being frank, but your post is the epitome of the pap I've beeDan B.-1/14/2001
5398Dan why are interested in XLA and TERN? Both are pennies now.....XLA is a facke Najib Mehanna-1/14/2001
5397VBG I think I managed, if unwittingly(bg), to cover my ass in bright bold letteDan B.-1/14/2001
5396OK, fine, then make claims that are not substantiated by anything other than supIlaine-1/12/2001
5395CobaltBlue, Re: "What I said is that I don't want to discuss STOCKS frDan B.-1/12/2001
5394Re: "Are Gilder's picks ALL up since he picked them? Can you back thatDan B.-1/12/2001
5393Digital Power Report out Monday (HPOW or POWI?) Both stocks closed at their higWaveSeeker-1/12/2001
5392What I said is that I don't want to discuss STOCKS from Gilder's perspecIlaine-1/12/2001
5391Are Gilder's picks ALL up since he picked them? Can you back that up with fIlaine-1/12/2001
5390Re: "For those of us who thought GG had some well touted picks, it's nDan B.-1/12/2001
5389For those of us who thought GG had some well touted picks, it's nice to see Gary E-1/12/2001
5388I don't mean to misrepresent what you are doing/saying here, and I don'tDan B.-1/12/2001
5387I'm not bashing, I am not ridiculing, I am not poo poohing. I don't wanIlaine-1/12/2001
5386Cobalt, Re: "At this point I don't see any reason to discuss stocks frDan B.-1/12/2001
5385At this point I don't see any reason to discuss stocks from George GilderIlaine-1/12/2001
5384Meaningless! IMO. Did you ever follow through on your threat to uncover the crimDan B.-1/12/2001
5383Frankly Cobalt, on this thread, I have to say, the bad ones often seem to be aboDan B.-1/12/2001
5382Boy, this Mr. Gilder sure can inflict pain on his loyal subscribers. Look at TERsilicon warrior-1/9/2001
5381This portfolio may be fairer to the investors that followed Gilder's siren cIlaine-1/5/2001
5380Tracking portfolio, anyone? For those who care, I made a model of Gilder's Joshua Corbin-1/5/2001
5379Bernard, in perfect fairness...a 40 week chart of selected stocks bears about asDan B.-12/29/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):