SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic
An SI Board Since June 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1141 14 0
Emcee:  jjayxxxx Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
541joseph, you realize that there is a speed limit of 20 on the moderated board rigmuzosi-1/15/2007
540"for what seems like a religious discussion" No. It is a "discusAli Chen-1/15/2007
539actually sarmad is at 20. the rule is more than 20 so he may not be in violationmuzosi-1/15/2007
538muzosi Yup. This is a classic case of useless arguing.Elmer Phud-1/15/2007
537yep, joseph & sarmad seem to be at each other's throat for what seems limuzosi-1/15/2007
536Rink - At least 1 poster is way over the post limit today. Are you going to chElmer Phud-1/15/2007
535"Is calling someone an idiot or moron a 48hr violation?" I think thatAli Chen-1/15/2007
534Rink, you have shown a remarkable ability to think you know what I'm thinkinElmer Phud-1/15/2007
533I have a general rule question. Is calling someone an idiot or moron a 48hr vioFJB-1/15/2007
532I have a quick question. Which socket AM2 uATX motherboards support 4 1G PC6400 Petz-1/15/2007
531Elmer you are being disingenious and insulting and you know it. You are wasting Rink-1/15/2007
530Paul, two days, minor insult. Message 23186190 Regards, RinkRink-1/15/2007
529Look, you already got 4 recs for your smart-mouth reply. No doubt coming from thdougSF30-1/15/2007
528<i>Shall I enumerate them for you, or would you like to go through them yobrushwud-1/14/2007
527<i>I did use moderation for your reply to it because it was 100% OT</i&dougSF30-1/14/2007
526Rink, the situation is exactly the same. You made no mention of any insult on myElmer Phud-1/13/2007
525Elmer, the situation is not the same if Pete did indeed not insult you like IRink-1/13/2007
524Doug, your post (the reply to HS2's post) was 100% OT. That's why you goRink-1/13/2007
523There was no request for moderation there. This is getting rather double-standardougSF30-1/13/2007
522Doug, mod related OT following the below post you reported from HS2 that insulteRink-1/13/2007
521For a good laugh: <i>I could see this all in 2005 which is why the 90nm tdougSF30-1/13/2007
520Rink per your rules: <i>Two days for OT. Elmer your first post begged forElmer Phud-1/12/2007
519muzo, <i>it seems volume may not be the vaccine amd was looking for.</Joe NYC-1/11/2007
518i didn't comment on your prediction abilities. i just commented on the opmuzosi-1/11/2007
517Gee, sorry I can't *perfectly* predict when AMD will choose to warn. Isn'dougSF30-1/11/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News