SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Environmental Remediation Hldg Corp. (ERHC)
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
671 6 0 ERHC
Emcee:  GrnArrow Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
546 Some serious buying happening today. Anybody know why? Great to see, anyway. ProphetAble-10/21/1998
545 John, as an investor in any stock, such as I have done in Boston Scientific, ATAndy-10/18/1998
544 Andy I am a dreamer who scored a double on this baby a while back. Bought @1.37John Riggs-10/18/1998
543 Andy: Well put! If a declining share price meant deficient management at petrJeff Williams-10/17/1998
542 Jeff, I agree with you 100%. Does Ed really knows the details what SchlumbergerAndy-10/16/1998
541 Ed: I am sure that Shlumberger (sp?) has geophysicists that can interpret the Jeff Williams-10/16/1998
540 Ed, you are trying to hide yourself under technical jargons. ERHC has its CEO Andy-10/16/1998
539 Bob, We all know that Andy has lost a fortune in this company so far based on Ed Silverstein-10/16/1998
538 Ed, this is what you said to me earlier: "Take my advice - true investors Andy-10/16/1998
537 1400% loss, wow!!! Please note that smart Ed will be receiving his PhD in geoloAndy-10/16/1998
536 Or you could say the stock is presently 100/1400 of it's 52 week high. In Bob Fairchild-10/15/1998
535 Restated differently to make it clear -- the stock price has lost about 90 to 9Ed Silverstein-10/15/1998
534 << No stock can be down 1400% from it's highs. >> Good point,O. H. Rundell-10/15/1998
533 No stock can be down 1400% from it's highs. It can only lose 100% of itreg-10/15/1998
532 You are weird! Case closed. Ed Silverstein-10/15/1998
531 I showed how wrong you are in saying that seismic data was expected when the sAndy-10/15/1998
530 I showed your posts to our highly experienced and educated geology co-workers (Ed Silverstein-10/15/1998
529 Ed, show me the proof that seismic was the reason for the hype in stock price wAndy-10/15/1998
528 Sounds like I ruffled your feathers. You have proven my point to everyone here Ed Silverstein-10/14/1998
527 It seems that you didn't see because you appeared to be blind. Read responsAndy-10/14/1998
526 I didn't see this latest press release (Oct. 13) of ERHC on the SI. Just waEd Silverstein-10/14/1998
525 Get a life. Ed Silverstein-10/14/1998
524 I am not giving you details on my portfolio. You accused me, and I intend to gAndy-10/14/1998
523 Take my advice - true investors don't buy BB stocks. What they do buy is sEd Silverstein-10/14/1998
522 I'm having a bad day Ed. The combination of nightshift, scotch, and my expBob Fairchild-10/14/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News