SEMITOOL (SMTL):Is it a hold? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
SEMITOOL (SMTL):Is it a hold?

An SI Board Since July 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
973	12	0	SMTL

Emcee: Perry	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
548	Electroplating vs. Electroless Cu Depositions : key differences 1.Both electr	Higgs Boson	-	10/14/1997
547	Guys: From the October issue of Solid State Technology: Wafers metallized with	Doug Skrypek	-	10/13/1997
546	Electro chemical deposition uses an applied bias to electrically attract the co	Running Bull	-	10/13/1997
545	Electrochemical depo vs. electroless depo: AMD announced in the Aug. 97 issue	ForYourEyesOnly	-	10/13/1997
544	John, I don't think PVD can deposit Cu in small contact/via (<0.35). CVD	semicon	-	10/13/1997
543	When are earnings due out? Any estimates? Are they going to meet or beat esti	M. Marquette	-	10/12/1997
542	<<Regarding sputtering, deposition in narrow-pitch areas with high aspect	Q.	-	10/10/1997
541	Selective CVD Depo of Cu: I found the following patent. It's held by some	ForYourEyesOnly	-	10/10/1997
540	Can't really say. I was intrigued myself. I have not heard of any success	Mason Barge	-	10/7/1997
539	Mason, Re: Cu Competition Do you have any input regarding the competetive posi	ForYourEyesOnly	-	10/7/1997
538	I heard Tool was looking for a new CFO. Maybe the old one left and he just ca	Running Bull	-	10/6/1997
537	Cu Competition I believe that the following are the major candidates for Cu de	ForYourEyesOnly	-	10/4/1997
536	Tom, Thanks for the input. I agree with you. Company insiders may sell for a g	Mike Taylor	-	10/3/1997
535	mike - you're absolutely right - if they charge an arm and a leg, it become	tom pope	-	10/3/1997
534	Tom & all, Glad you find it worth while. Can you share with us your exper	Mike Taylor	-	10/3/1997
533	super find - and worth subscribing to when they put it on a subscription basis.	tom pope	-	10/3/1997
532	Nice find, Mike. That's the biggest value of these boards, that all the re	Mason Barge	-	10/3/1997
531	Found something interesting but may not be too meaningful. techstocks.com Ju	Mike Taylor	-	10/3/1997
530	I will say my two cents' worth. One, SMTL is a very well-managed company.	Mason Barge	-	10/2/1997
529	<<In any case, electroplating of metals is as old as the hills, so all th	SemiBull	-	10/2/1997
528	Of the 41 patents assigned to semitool, none have a title that refers to copper	Q.	-	10/2/1997
527	THC, I just saw this same post on the SFAM thread. I'm sure Mr. Sam will	SemiBull	-	10/2/1997
526	ALL: If Cu replaces Al and SMTL's machine becomes the tool of choice, then	ForYourEyesOnly	-	10/2/1997
525	All: Is Semitool's copper depo process patented? This will definitely st	ForYourEyesOnly	-	10/2/1997
524	John, Touche'! I couldn't of said it better myself...SemiBull	SemiBull	-	10/2/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):