SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
PPD (Pre-paid Legal Services) on the move
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
801 10 0 PPD
Emcee:  Lee Hsu Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
551 Insider selling is only one factor to consider. 136,000 shares and $4m is an eyArthur Radley-11/30/1997
550 Hey TexasDude.....the only insider selling I could dig up was Stonecipher selliBARRY ALLEN-11/29/1997
549 Robert, You are being selective in responding to my recap of the facts containeArthur Radley-11/26/1997
548 CHOOSE means if the new associate (and in some cases old) chooses the $249 FastRobert Graber-11/26/1997
547 Robert, You need to read PPD's SEC filings and not take my word. However, Arthur Radley-11/25/1997
546 Texas Dude- Commissions are going up due to extremely successful and productiveRobert Graber-11/25/1997
545 Robert, I am surprised that you would indicate that fewer associates is good. PArthur Radley-11/25/1997
544 Well said, Robert. PE and PS levels are a little lofty but PPD has shown for thPaul Schmidt-11/25/1997
543 Less new associates is GOOD. Associates need to be trained under the $249 Fast Robert Graber-11/25/1997
542 Robert, Speaking of facts I would like your interpretation of these tidbits in Arthur Radley-11/23/1997
541 I grant you the fact that I don't know the % of salespeople that quit over Arthur Radley-11/23/1997
540 What they do to a sales person is NOT irrelevant. This company is not like mostRobert Graber-11/23/1997
539 Robert, I'm not shorting the salespersons stock, I'm shorting PPD stockArthur Radley-11/23/1997
538 What Olstein and everyone else fergot- if you get paid a 3 year advance and thaRobert Graber-11/22/1997
537 TexasDude, I'm just playing it safe. It may actually go up if they announcRuss Parker-11/21/1997
536 Morning Paul, Currently PPD is sporting a 40 PE and can be expected for a compaArthur Radley-11/21/1997
535 TexasDude, what do you mean by "full grown puppy"? Revenue and earninPaul Schmidt-11/21/1997
534 RE:P.S. H. Greenberg who wrote the Fortune article writes for the San FranciscoRichard Smith-11/20/1997
533 Well Richard, I tried the congenial approach and it didn't work.At least I Arthur Radley-11/20/1997
532 RE:I really don't see the relevance of comparing Iomega and PPD. the relevRichard Smith-11/20/1997
531 All I'd like to add to this is that PPD's revenue and EPS have continueSky-11/20/1997
530 Richard, I really don't see the relevance of comparing Iomega and PPD.If yoArthur Radley-11/20/1997
529 by the way, you are so sure that because insiders sold shares the company is goRichard Smith-11/20/1997
528 the shorts are wrong here, same as they were wrong with iomega. they kept talkiRichard Smith-11/20/1997
527 Russ, You made a wise decision on getting out of this soon to be "full groArthur Radley-11/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News