SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Galapagos Islands
An SI Board Since September 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
57110 182 0 COMPX
Emcee:  Jorj X Mckie Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
55260Just a little over a thousand to go, if you type real fast......J.B.C.-3/2/2006
55259I have to leave in 15minutes...I'm not going to be here for the grub....thisJorj X Mckie-3/2/2006
55258Nice grub. It's your lucky day, hope it comes in time. Jim Edit: Ops, itJ.B.C.-3/2/2006
55257Naz has been coiling in a tight range for a year now......to me, it looks like aJorj X Mckie-3/2/2006
55256well, if you guys would start posting we'd have a better chance of making itJorj X Mckie-3/2/2006
55255I'm betting we'll not see it until later this afternoon, IMO. JimJ.B.C.-3/2/2006
55254I hope it comes soon, I have to go to San Diego today and I want to win this freJorj X Mckie-3/2/2006
55253Glad to see you back on this thread, Libby. Did you notice that you had a full-PuddleGlum-3/2/2006
55252Some more discussion about the SEC and the recent controversy: Message 22216336Libbyt-3/1/2006
55251:-)mph-3/1/2006
55250...only by *SOME* :-)faqsnlojiks -3/1/2006
55249and so under-appreciated<g>mph-3/1/2006
55248you're so good. ;-)faqsnlojiks -3/1/2006
55247You can tell by the way the scenario is set up and the question is posed. "mph-3/1/2006
55246yes...villagers/pitchforks comes to mind <gg>MulhollandDrive-2/28/2006
55245<i>a high degree of transparency is required to keep 'economic journalLibbyt-2/28/2006
55244<i>I think the pollsters expected the answer to be "yes"</i&gLibbyt-2/28/2006
55243i'm really not that surprised at the lopsidedness of the poll.. people undeMulhollandDrive-2/28/2006
55242Just checked it myself. I think the pollsters expected the answer to be "ymph-2/28/2006
55241It will be interesting to see which gap fills first...the one up at 425 or the oJorj X Mckie-2/28/2006
55240well i voted.... "no" did you see the results? so far 89% NOMulhollandDrive-2/28/2006
55239Okay, I'm preparing 9,000 posts to spray all over the website. I figure thPatrick Slevin-2/28/2006
55238er, uh....how 'bout that google?? :)MulhollandDrive-2/28/2006
55237"Was SEC out of bounds on subpoenas?" (As posted on the CNBC web siteLibbyt-2/27/2006
55236Those inscrutable admins.Alan Smithee-2/27/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):