SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
First Calgary Petroleums, Ltd (FCP.T)
An SI Board Since December 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
603 11 0 FCP
Emcee:  darra Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
553That seems like an ultra conservative estimate when you look at FCP's track timester-3/16/2005
552Without the damage to their plant, SU should be producing about +250,000 boe/d. Cal Gary-3/16/2005
551I like them apples - $46.50/share - SU and $21.20 FCP. It would take awhile to timester-3/15/2005
550Another apples and oranges tale: SU 454 million shares out Market Cap = $21.34 Cal Gary-3/14/2005
549Timster, I don't think we will see this go into the summer. It will be a doKen O'Connor-3/11/2005
548Interesting that with the date of the drilling early in April that would mean thtimester-3/11/2005
547First Calgary continues reviewing stategic alternatives First Calgary PetroleumCal Gary-3/11/2005
546Does anyone know if the D&M report will be what is required by the annual retimester-3/10/2005
545<i>SUBJECT: Nothing has changed Posted By: Dutchfella Post Time: 3/10/Cal Gary-3/10/2005
544My my was the stock ever on sale yesterday and today...couldn't help myself Ken O'Connor-3/8/2005
543First Calgary Petroleums has no new news First Calgary Petroleums Ltd (TSX:FCP)Cal Gary-3/8/2005
542Remember that Gap we were talking about?? Well its closed now. Buy! Buy!Cal Gary-3/7/2005
541I think it is simply a matter of recognizing a value to a partnership at some potimester-3/2/2005
540Apples and oranges maybe true, but there is regional and pricing element that arCal Gary-3/2/2005
539On CUX deal I think it is hard to compare the two figures as CUX retained the ritimester-3/1/2005
538Hi Cal Gary, yes lot's of volatility on those others while FCP remains in a Ken O'Connor-2/28/2005
537TGL strikes out on not one, but two expected wells today. Wow. Coupled with CUX Cal Gary-2/28/2005
536CUX sells mature Tunisian producing properties. CUX managed to get only $21,700/Cal Gary-2/28/2005
535FCP's Les-2 and the posted Sonatrach text are touting a new interval, the TrCal Gary-2/22/2005
534Hi Timester, I certainly understand where you're coming from, however the reKen O'Connor-2/22/2005
533Anyone care to comment on the News being talked about on the SH thread by 2kpromtimester-2/21/2005
532Ken you seem very confident that this round of bidding will present a winner andtimester-2/20/2005
531Another tremendous well, only MLE-6 results to wait for now before the buyout. Ken O'Connor-2/19/2005
530First Calgary reviews LES-2 production testing 2005-02-16 10:00 ET - News ReleaCal Gary-2/16/2005
529Going to be a nice last half of the week !!!! Now that just may be an understateKen O'Connor-2/15/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News