Superconductor Technologies : SCON | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Superconductor Technologies : SCON

An SI Board Since February 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
903	41	0	SCON

Emcee: Marshall	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
553	Coach, Rob was the one who bought PCLN at 140s, 150s and hyped that it was goin	Tom Hua	-	2/29/2000
552	nope...i guess it really was a bull trap...hope you didn't lose a leg in it	big run	-	2/29/2000
551	Web, hope you don't mind a recap about this company: 1. Very poor financi	Tom Hua	-	2/29/2000
550	agreed, tom... i think scon, cdts and isco are all heading lower for a few day	coachbobknight	-	2/29/2000
549	<i>Basicly if you believe in the ultimate doom of the stock (which I	Tom Hua	-	2/29/2000
548	O/T Ago, good to see you posting again! Took a vacation in the mountain? We	Jon Khymn	-	2/29/2000
547	Tom, just beautiful timing! My hat's off to you. Since I was long on SCON	Jon Khymn	-	2/29/2000
546	If you look at it's 3 month chart, hardly a weak stock. <vbg>	Robert Rose	-	2/29/2000
545	well off it's 115 high though...depends on how you wanna look at it.	big run	-	2/29/2000
544	Well, not sure whether you're referring to an up or down retrace. At any ra	Robert Rose	-	2/29/2000
543	Looks like the dead cat bounce is over!!! The retrace has begun!!!!	shrtslr	-	2/29/2000
542	No problem, Rob Here is another article talking about the upcoming new products	Foo Bar	-	2/29/2000
541	So you and I are in total agreement. I'm sorry if my post did not make that	Robert Rose	-	2/29/2000
540	No, I did not wake up in the middle of the night and realizing that this segmen	Foo Bar	-	2/29/2000
539	<Perhaps most of the people on this post are technical traders which I am no	Robert Rose	-	2/29/2000
538	Perhaps most of the people on this post are technical traders which I am not, s	Foo Bar	-	2/29/2000
537	Good. Amazement suggests some preconceived notions, but still some openness to	Robert Rose	-	2/29/2000
536	i am yet amazed...	big run	-	2/29/2000
535	Now at 95. Covering/going long continues.	Robert Rose	-	2/29/2000
534	Seeing scon touch its 10-day at 50 would be healthy for the stock. However, I d	Robert Rose	-	2/29/2000
533	that would be declining volume from 80 to where it's at right now....a very	big run	-	2/29/2000
532	my gosh....you have a vivid imagination....I remember shorting JWEB at 80 and h	FDHIII	-	2/29/2000
531	What I see is heavier volume as shorting picked up from 105 down to 80, and the	Robert Rose	-	2/29/2000
530	looks more like a bounce to sell into...lighter volume and all on this move.	big run	-	2/29/2000
529	scon now at 87. Showing a lot of strength in this reversal. We should inch high	Robert Rose	-	2/29/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):