SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Sterling Software
An SI Board Since November 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
206 3 0 SSW
Emcee:  Ira Vine Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
56 Hi Ramsey - I was looking at the annual report and reading all the stuff about kech-2/17/1997
55 Sterling and others were unfairly hurt due to Computer Associates poor earningsmark o-2/15/1997
54 Michael, Zacks was .33 also. SSW suffers from a severe case of no respect. WiRamsey Su-2/12/1997
53 To All Earnings came in at .33 a share. What was expected? Southwest SecuritMichael J. Gonzalez-2/12/1997
52 Tom, only mentioned CA as a hypothetical situation. No possibility whatsoever.Ramsey Su-1/16/1997
51 Ramsey- I wonder about the tax implications. If CA buys SSW what happens to thkech-1/16/1997
50 R. Michael, the more I look at SSW, the more attractive it becomes. SSW now onRamsey Su-1/16/1997
49 I agree with you and that's why I am holding the stock. It's the only rR. Michael Knipp-1/15/1997
48 R. Michael, with all the cash sitting around, how many acquisition candidates cRamsey Su-1/15/1997
47 Excellent candidates for Sterling would be large undervalued mainframe system mR. Michael Knipp-1/15/1997
46 I think Sterling adopted some anti-takover stuff a few weeks ago to prevent anJohn-1/15/1997
45 John, if I understand your employer's busy, SSW is now heavy into governmenRamsey Su-1/14/1997
44 Sorry, I have no insites into which companies Sterling might be considering foJohn-1/14/1997
43 John, any idea what type of company would be a match for Sterling? RamseyRamsey Su-1/13/1997
42 It is my understanding that - for tax reasons, Sterling must use the money fromJohn-1/13/1997
41 Ramsey, my software showed the following after Friday's activity: 1) bulliJan Robert Wolansky-1/13/1997
40 Jan, give me a little more on what you see on the TA side. I don't subscriRamsey Su-1/12/1997
39 For what it's worth, SSW's technical indicators seem to have turned verJan Robert Wolansky-1/12/1997
38 Michael, what I don't understand is why SSW do not just buy back shares at Ramsey Su-1/12/1997
37 To All Hambrecht & Quist started new coverage on SSW with a buy rating. InMichael J. Gonzalez-1/12/1997
36 Tom, only wish there are more knowledgeable participants here, as in the case oRamsey Su-1/11/1997
35 Hi Ramsey, Looks good to me too - the growth will come from their acquistitikech-1/11/1997
34 Ramsey -- I haven't followed Sterling since seeing it at the Alex Brown Copat mudge-1/9/1997
33 Pat, just trying to drum up some interest in this otherwise boring company. IRamsey Su-1/9/1997
32 Adam -- I haven't followed Sterling since I saw them at the Alex Brown conpat mudge-12/22/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News