SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
First Solar, Nasdaq: FSLR
An SI Board Since January 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
912 54 0 FSLR
Emcee:  Jim Oravetz Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
562July 29, 2008, 12:25 pm First Solar: Street Optimistic On Tomorrow’s Earnings RpEric-7/30/2008
561First Solar Inaugurates Its First of Four Solar Module Manufacturing Plants in KEric-7/29/2008
560First Solar earnings conference call Wednesday July 30th at 1:30 PM Pacific timeEric-7/29/2008
559thought that might be the case. Some people add a 'p', as in 10MWp, to allatwwk-7/28/2008
558That is the name plate rating of the panels under standard conditions of temp anEric-7/28/2008
55710mW isn't a lot (is this a peak number?). But what is noteworthy is how quallatwwk-7/28/2008
556First Solar to Build 10 MW Solar PV Power Plant for Sempra Generation Jul 24, Eric-7/24/2008
555First Solar to Participate in Investor Conferences Jul 21, 2008 19:03:01 (ET) Eric-7/22/2008
554First Solar, Inc. to Announce 2008 Second Quarter Financial Results on WednesdayEric-7/22/2008
553Man those drops on I-5 are remarkable.The Reaper-7/21/2008
552Interesting chart on highway traffic in San Diego and other parts of California.slacker711-7/21/2008
551mobil merged with xom because it was losing so much money and no reserves to speJohn Carragher-7/21/2008
550Good points...Road Walker-7/21/2008
549john xom and other oil companies have been terrible predictors on the price of fJohn Carragher-7/21/2008
548<i>since the corporation is to make a return on investment for the sharehoRoad Walker-7/21/2008
547<i>Let's say that this is true, there isnt much we can do about the cuRoad Walker-7/21/2008
546my understanding it goes back to gov until they once again open up bids if they John Carragher-7/21/2008
545<i>There are some that suspect the oil companies figure they can make moreslacker711-7/21/2008
544There are some that suspect the oil companies figure they can make more money byRoad Walker-7/21/2008
543dan i ran a large gasoline delivery terminal during first allocation. two yearJohn Carragher-7/21/2008
542John, I considered the source and figured the >60% is bogus, but I bet it is DanD-7/21/2008
541when the bid for tracts of land to drill the companies have identified most desiJohn Carragher-7/21/2008
540One reasonable "environmental" case for not opening up new federal leaDanD-7/21/2008
539<I>“No amount of oil and no amount of money is worth despoiling the Arcticslacker711-7/21/2008
538Yes... start up costs are high. The home energy station looks promising as well.Sdgla-7/20/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News